Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Three hydrogen-rich solutions protect against intestinal injury in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock

Du Z, Liu J, Jia H, Xu W, Zhao X. · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2015;8(5):7620-7626.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2015Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Male Wistar rats weighing 290-320 g in an uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock model.

Intervention and dose

Intravenous resuscitation after shock with hydrogen-rich Ringer's solution, hydrogen-rich hydroxyethyl starch (HES), or hydrogen-rich hypertonic-saline/HES solution. · Each solution was exposed to H₂ for six hours at 0.4 MPa to a supersaturated level and stored without headspace at 4°C. The article does not report numerical H₂ concentration, infusion volume or infusion rate.

Duration

Acute post-shock resuscitation and intestinal tissue collection; exact infusion timing, volume and endpoint time are not clearly reported in the article.

Reported result

All three H₂-rich solutions were associated with lower MDA, MPO, IL-6 and TNF-α, higher IL-10 and less histological injury than their matched solutions. Results text says SOD improved with H₂, while one discussion sentence says it was lower; Hydrogenology marks the SOD direction as internally inconsistent.

Main limitation

Acute rat model, n=10 groups, multiple surrogate endpoints, no survival or systemic-organ assessment, missing H₂ concentration/infusion dose/timing and an internal SOD-direction contradiction. No funding or conflict statement was identified in the article, so absence is not inferred.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized seven-group rat uncontrolled-hemorrhagic-shock resuscitation experiment

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Male Wistar rats weighing 290-320 g in an uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock model.

Sample

70 rats randomized to sham or six resuscitation groups, n=10 each: Ringer's, HES or hypertonic-saline/HES solution, each with or without dissolved H₂.

Duration

Acute post-shock resuscitation and intestinal tissue collection; exact infusion timing, volume and endpoint time are not clearly reported in the article.

Intervention

Intravenous resuscitation after shock with hydrogen-rich Ringer's solution, hydrogen-rich hydroxyethyl starch (HES), or hydrogen-rich hypertonic-saline/HES solution.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved separately in three intravenous solutions — H₂ only, not Brown's gas and not inhalation.

Dose or H₂ specification

Each solution was exposed to H₂ for six hours at 0.4 MPa to a supersaturated level and stored without headspace at 4°C. The article does not report numerical H₂ concentration, infusion volume or infusion rate.

Comparator

Matching non-hydrogen Ringer's, HES and hypertonic-saline/HES solutions, plus sham surgery.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Intestinal MDA, SOD, MPO, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10 and histological villus/inflammatory injury.

Reported result

All three H₂-rich solutions were associated with lower MDA, MPO, IL-6 and TNF-α, higher IL-10 and less histological injury than their matched solutions. Results text says SOD improved with H₂, while one discussion sentence says it was lower; Hydrogenology marks the SOD direction as internally inconsistent.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article was checked for all seven groups, solution preparation, missing concentration/dose/timing, positive results, the internal SOD contradiction, funding and available disclosures.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Acute rat model, n=10 groups, multiple surrogate endpoints, no survival or systemic-organ assessment, missing H₂ concentration/infusion dose/timing and an internal SOD-direction contradiction. No funding or conflict statement was identified in the article, so absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in male rats; it does not establish a human resuscitation fluid.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 26221308

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.