Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Protective Effects of Hydrogen against Low-Dose Long-Term Radiation-Induced Damage to the Behavioral Performances, Hematopoietic System, Genital System, and Splenic Lymphocytes in Mice

Guo J, Zhao D, Lei X, Zhao H, Yang Y, Zhang P, Liu P, Xu Y, Zhu M, Liu H, Chen Y, Chuai Y, Li B, Gao F, Cai J. · 2016.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2016
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled mouse radiation-exposure study

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Mixed positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Animal behavioral, tissue and laboratory outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Mice exposed to low-dose, long-duration radiation.

Sample

80 mice across intervention and control groups.

Duration

Long-term low-dose radiation protocol with behavioral and tissue testing.

Intervention

Hydrogen-rich water during the radiation protocol.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water.

H₂ specification

Article-specific preparation and replacement schedule.

H₂ flow

Not applicable.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Radiation-exposed and non-exposed controls with conventional water.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Behavior, hematopoietic and reproductive measures, splenic lymphocytes and oxidative markers.

Reported result

Several behavioral, hematopoietic, reproductive and oxidative measures favored hydrogen water, while not every measured outcome differed.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Animal evidence only; many endpoints increase multiplicity and selective-reporting concerns.

Applies directly to

The reported mouse radiation model only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Controlled groups were present, but allocation concealment, assessor blinding and multiplicity handling were unclear.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 27774116 · DOI: 10.1155/2016/1947819

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10