Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Influence of hydrogen-occluding-silica on migration and apoptosis in human esophageal cells in vitro .

Li Q, Tanaka Y, Miwa N. · 2017.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled in-vitro cell study

Research topic

Cancer research

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Mixed cytotoxic preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Cell viability, migration and mechanistic laboratory outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Human esophageal squamous-carcinoma cells and normal esophageal epithelial cells.

Sample

Cell-culture assays with article-specific replicate counts.

Duration

Article-specific cell-culture exposure periods.

Intervention

Hydrogen-occluding silica added to culture medium to release molecular hydrogen.

Hydrogen form

H₂ released into cell-culture medium by hydrogen-occluding silica.

H₂ specification

Concentration-dependent silica exposures, including a high 1,200-ppm condition.

H₂ flow

Not applicable.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Untreated cell cultures and concentration comparisons.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Cell viability, proliferation, migration, reactive-oxygen-species measures and apoptosis markers.

Reported result

The preparation inhibited carcinoma-cell proliferation and migration, while high concentrations also showed cytotoxic or apoptosis-related effects in normal epithelial cells.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Cell-only study of a silica product; effects cannot be assigned to molecular hydrogen alone and do not establish anticancer benefit.

Applies directly to

The tested esophageal cell lines only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

In-vitro study appraisal — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Comparator cultures were used, but replicate independence, assay blinding and product-specific confounding limit interpretation.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28744359 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.208510

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10