Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen ventilation combined with mild hypothermia improves short-term neurological outcomes in a 5-day neonatal hypoxia-ischaemia piglet model.

Htun Y, Nakamura S, Nakao Y, Mitsuie T, Nakamura M, Yamato S, Jinnai W, Koyano K, Ohta K, Morimoto A, Wakabayashi T, Sugino M, Fujioka K, Kato I, Kondo S, Yasuda S, Miki T, Ueno M, Kusaka T. · 2019.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Newborn piglets after hypoxic-ischemic injury.

Intervention and dose

2.1–2.7% H₂ ventilation combined with therapeutic hypothermia for 24 hours. · Delivered H₂ varied from 2.1% to 2.7% as oxygen requirements changed.

Duration

24-hour treatment with five-day neurological and histological follow-up.

Reported result

The hypothermia-plus-H₂ group had better short-term neurological scores than normothermia and favorable histological trends; the design does not isolate H₂ from hypothermia.

Main limitation

Preclinical piglet model, small groups and no H₂-without-hypothermia arm.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled neonatal-piglet study

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Positive preclinical combination signal with incomplete arm separation.

Outcome type

Animal functional and histological outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Newborn piglets after hypoxic-ischemic injury.

Sample

Three groups with five-day survival; group counts were checked in the full article.

Duration

24-hour treatment with five-day neurological and histological follow-up.

Intervention

2.1–2.7% H₂ ventilation combined with therapeutic hypothermia for 24 hours.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂ with mechanical ventilation.

Dose or H₂ specification

Delivered H₂ varied from 2.1% to 2.7% as oxygen requirements changed.

H₂ flow

Absolute H₂ flow was not reported separately.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Oxygen concentration was adjusted within the ventilation protocol.

Comparator

Normothermia and therapeutic-hypothermia groups without H₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Neurological scores, walking ability and brain histology.

Reported result

The hypothermia-plus-H₂ group had better short-term neurological scores than normothermia and favorable histological trends; the design does not isolate H₂ from hypothermia.

Extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical piglet model, small groups and no H₂-without-hypothermia arm.

Applies directly to

The reported neonatal-piglet injury and combined-treatment protocol only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Controlled groups were present, but the missing H₂-alone arm, small samples and incomplete blinding create concerns.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 30858437 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40674-8

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.