Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Inhalation of high-concentration hydrogen gas attenuates cognitive deficits in a rat model of asphyxia induced-cardiac arrest

Huang L, Applegate RL II, Applegate PM, Gong L, Ocak U, Boling W, Zhang JH. · Medical Gas Research. 2019;9(3):122–126.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

44 nine-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats assigned to sham, cardiac arrest, post-arrest H₂/O₂ or pre- and post-arrest H₂/O₂ groups.

Intervention and dose

One hour before plus one hour after resuscitation, or two hours beginning one hour after resuscitation, in a treatment chamber. · The gas composition and generator model were reported, but total chamber flow was absent; component mL/min values therefore cannot be calculated.

Duration

One-hour pre- and post-treatment or two-hour post-treatment; cognitive and neuronal outcomes through day 18.

Reported result

Both H₂/O₂ schedules improved selected water-maze measures and reduced CA1 neuronal degeneration at day 18. Day-7 T-maze differences versus untreated arrest were not significant, swimming speed did not differ, and treatment did not materially alter reported hemodynamic parameters.

Main limitation

Small male-rat groups, pre-treatment arm has limited clinical realism, no matched chamber-gas comparator described, follow-up only 18 days, multiple cognitive endpoints and mechanism not established. Authors reported no financial support and no conflicts; the commercial generator and manufacturer were identified.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Four-group rat asphyxial-cardiac-arrest experiment comparing post-treatment with pre-plus-post treatment

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

44 nine-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats assigned to sham, cardiac arrest, post-arrest H₂/O₂ or pre- and post-arrest H₂/O₂ groups.

Sample

44 rats: sham n=6, cardiac arrest n=13, post-treatment n=13 and pre-plus-post treatment n=12; cognitive/histology time-point analyses generally used n=6 per group.

Duration

One-hour pre- and post-treatment or two-hour post-treatment; cognitive and neuronal outcomes through day 18.

Intervention

One hour before plus one hour after resuscitation, or two hours beginning one hour after resuscitation, in a treatment chamber.

Hydrogen form

Brown's gas / oxyhydrogen generated by water electrolysis at 67% H₂ and 33% O₂.

Dose or H₂ specification

The gas composition and generator model were reported, but total chamber flow was absent; component mL/min values therefore cannot be calculated.

H₂ flow

Not reported — total gas flow is absent.

O₂ delivered with H₂

33% O₂; mL/min flow not reported because total gas flow is absent.

Comparator

Sham surgery and cardiac arrest without H₂/O₂ treatment; the article does not describe a matched chamber-gas exposure for untreated arrest animals.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Hemodynamics, day-7 T-maze, days 14–18 Morris water maze and hippocampal CA1 Fluoro-Jade neuronal degeneration.

Reported result

Both H₂/O₂ schedules improved selected water-maze measures and reduced CA1 neuronal degeneration at day 18. Day-7 T-maze differences versus untreated arrest were not significant, swimming speed did not differ, and treatment did not materially alter reported hemodynamic parameters.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article and figures were checked for group counts, schedule/composition, absent flow, positive and null cognitive/physiological findings, histology, limitations, support and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small male-rat groups, pre-treatment arm has limited clinical realism, no matched chamber-gas comparator described, follow-up only 18 days, multiple cognitive endpoints and mechanism not established. Authors reported no financial support and no conflicts; the commercial generator and manufacturer were identified.

Applies directly to

Experimental asphyxial cardiac arrest in older rats; it does not establish cognitive benefit after human cardiac arrest.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 31552874 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.266986

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.