Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

An Immunohistochemical Study of the Increase in Antioxidant Capacity of Corneal Epithelial Cells by Molecular Hydrogen, Leading to the Suppression of Alkali-Induced Oxidative Stress.

Cejka C, Kossl J, Holan V, Zhang JH, Cejkova J. · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2020;2020:7435260.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2020
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled rabbit study

Research topic

Eye health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Animal eye tissue and biomarker outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Rabbit corneas exposed to an alkali-burn protocol.

Sample

30 rabbits initially; five per group were assessed after pretreatment and ten per group continued to alkali injury.

Duration

Three-day pretreatment with post-injury assessment.

Intervention

Hydrogen-saturated phosphate-buffered saline applied to the cornea four times daily for three days before injury.

Hydrogen form

H2 dissolved in buffered saline; not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

1.5±0.2 ppm at preparation and approximately 0.8 ppm at corneal application.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — topical solution.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Phosphate-buffered saline without added hydrogen.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Corneal hydration, epithelial integrity, histology and oxidative-stress immunostaining.

Reported result

Hydrogen-saline pretreatment was associated with less corneal damage and lower selected oxidative-stress markers after alkali injury.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article, methods, group flow, histology and immunostaining outcomes were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Pretreatment animal model; it does not establish prevention or treatment effects in human eye injury.

Applies directly to

The reported rabbit alkali-burn model.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Allocation and assessor blinding were not clearly reported.

Appraisal domains

Randomization/allocation reporting is limited · Blinding of personnel is unclear · Attrition is incompletely reported in places · Blinding of outcome assessors is unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32655773 · DOI: 10.1155/2020/7435260

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed record and PubMed Central full text; extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10