Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen gas inhalation improves delayed brain injury by alleviating early brain injury after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage

Kumagai K et al. · Sci Rep. 2020;10:12319.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Rats with experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage and unilateral common-carotid occlusion

Intervention and dose

Inhalation on days 0 and 1: 2 hours on day 0 and 30 minutes on day 1 · 1.3% H₂, 30% O₂ and nitrogen balance.

Duration

Two inhalation sessions with outcomes through day 7

Reported result

The article reports improvement in early and delayed brain-injury measures. Cerebral vasospasm did not improve significantly.

Main limitation

Complex animal model, attrition into smaller outcome cohorts, multiple laboratory endpoints and no human participants. The null vasospasm result is retained.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled rat subarachnoid-hemorrhage plus carotid-occlusion experiment

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Rats with experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage and unilateral common-carotid occlusion

Sample

101 rats entered the protocol: sham n=31, control n=35 and H₂ n=33; later outcome cohorts were smaller

Duration

Two inhalation sessions with outcomes through day 7

Intervention

Inhalation on days 0 and 1: 2 hours on day 0 and 30 minutes on day 1

Hydrogen form

H₂ diluted in oxygen and nitrogen — not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

1.3% H₂, 30% O₂ and nitrogen balance.

H₂ flow

Not reported — concentration is given, but H₂ flow in mL/min is not.

O₂ delivered with H₂

30% O₂ was co-delivered; O₂ flow in mL/min was not reported.

Comparator

30% O₂ with nitrogen balance, without H₂, plus sham surgery

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Brain edema, neurological deficits, S100B, JNK, astrogliosis, vasospasm and neuronal death

Reported result

The article reports improvement in early and delayed brain-injury measures. Cerebral vasospasm did not improve significantly.

Extraction completeness

Gas composition, allocation, figures and positive and null results checked in the open-access full text.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Complex animal model, attrition into smaller outcome cohorts, multiple laboratory endpoints and no human participants. The null vasospasm result is retained.

Applies directly to

Experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage with added carotid occlusion in rats, not patients with aneurysmal hemorrhage.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32704088 · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69028-5

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text and PubMed record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.