Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Electrolytic hydrogen-generating bottle supplies drinking water with free/combined chlorine and ozone repressed within safety standard under hydrogen-rich conditions

Hatae T, Miwa N. · Medical Gas Research. 2021;11(2):61–65.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2021Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Osaka municipal tap water electrolyzed in commercial bottle-type H₂-water generators; no animals or people were exposed.

Intervention and dose

Direct-current electrolysis of 165–330 mL tap water for 10–30 minutes in named household devices. · The focal bottle produced 444±7.2 μg/L dissolved H₂ after 10 minutes and a mean 479.3±79.1 μg/L after 30 minutes; gas generation flow was not provided.

Duration

Ten to thirty minutes of electrolysis followed by immediate water-chemistry measurement.

Reported result

The focal device increased dissolved H₂ while measured residual chlorine remained far below the cited 5 mg/L WHO value and ozone was below the reported 0.05 mg/L detection limit. Some other bottles showed time-dependent chlorine readings but still below the cited limit. No biological toxicity, consumption or health outcome was tested.

Main limitation

Bench chemistry only, small repeats, selected commercial devices, no comprehensive contaminant analysis, no biological safety assessment and broad health language unsupported by this experiment. Authors reported no funding and no conflict.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Bench comparison of household electrolysis bottles and water-chemistry measurements

Research topic

Other molecular hydrogen research

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Osaka municipal tap water electrolyzed in commercial bottle-type H₂-water generators; no animals or people were exposed.

Sample

Repeated measurements (reported n=4–12, in two to four experimental repeats) across full/half volumes, times and devices.

Duration

Ten to thirty minutes of electrolysis followed by immediate water-chemistry measurement.

Intervention

Direct-current electrolysis of 165–330 mL tap water for 10–30 minutes in named household devices.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in electrolyzed drinking water; the evolved-gas H₂/O₂ composition was not reported, so it is not labeled Brown's gas and was not inhaled.

Dose or H₂ specification

The focal bottle produced 444±7.2 μg/L dissolved H₂ after 10 minutes and a mean 479.3±79.1 μg/L after 30 minutes; gas generation flow was not provided.

Comparator

Tap water before electrolysis and several commercial electrolyzer bottles; measurements used multiple chlorine/ozone methods.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Dissolved H₂, ORP, free/combined/total residual chlorine and dissolved ozone.

Reported result

The focal device increased dissolved H₂ while measured residual chlorine remained far below the cited 5 mg/L WHO value and ozone was below the reported 0.05 mg/L detection limit. Some other bottles showed time-dependent chlorine readings but still below the cited limit. No biological toxicity, consumption or health outcome was tested.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, methods, tables/figures and disclosures were checked for device names, water volumes, dissolved concentration, missing flow/gas composition, chlorine/ozone findings, replication, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Bench chemistry only, small repeats, selected commercial devices, no comprehensive contaminant analysis, no biological safety assessment and broad health language unsupported by this experiment. Authors reported no funding and no conflict.

Applies directly to

Water-generator chemistry under the tested tap-water conditions; it does not prove that a device or its water is clinically beneficial or comprehensively safe.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33818445 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.311496

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.