Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Safety of prolonged inhalation of hydrogen gas in air in healthy adults

Cole AR, Sperotto F, DiNardo JA, Carlisle S, Rivkin MJ, Sleeper LA, Kheir JN. · Critical Care Explorations. 2021;3(10):e0543.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2021Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy adults aged 18–30 years admitted for directly observed high-flow nasal-cannula exposure.

Intervention and dose

Premixed 2.4% H₂ in medical air delivered continuously by heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula at 15 L/min after a four-hour medical-air acclimatization period. · Certified premix containing 2.4% H₂ in 21% O₂, balance nitrogen; total delivered flow 15 L/min.

Duration

Continuous exposure for 24, 48 or 72 hours, followed by testing and telephone follow-up one day and three to five days later.

Reported result

No clinically significant adverse event or organ-injury signal was observed. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, neurologic scores and most laboratory measures were unchanged; small heart-rate, peak-flow, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet and chloride changes were judged clinically insignificant.

Main limitation

Only eight young healthy adults, single arm, no blinding and insufficient power to detect uncommon harms or establish safety in patients. Serum H₂ was not measured. The Pappendick Family award, Harvard Catalyst, NIH/NCATS and Harvard-affiliated institutions supported the work; authors disclosed no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Prospective single-arm sequential-duration inpatient safety study

Research topic

Other molecular hydrogen research

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy adults aged 18–30 years admitted for directly observed high-flow nasal-cannula exposure.

Sample

Eight participants completed exposure: n=2 for 24 hours, n=2 for 48 hours and n=4 for 72 hours; four were women and four men.

Duration

Continuous exposure for 24, 48 or 72 hours, followed by testing and telephone follow-up one day and three to five days later.

Intervention

Premixed 2.4% H₂ in medical air delivered continuously by heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula at 15 L/min after a four-hour medical-air acclimatization period.

Hydrogen form

H₂ alone as the study gas diluted in medical air — not Brown's gas or oxyhydrogen.

Dose or H₂ specification

Certified premix containing 2.4% H₂ in 21% O₂, balance nitrogen; total delivered flow 15 L/min.

H₂ flow

360 mL/min H₂, calculated directly from the reported 15,000 mL/min total flow × 2.4% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

3,150 mL/min O₂, calculated directly from 15,000 mL/min × the reported 21% O₂; O₂ was carrier medical air, not a Brown's-gas co-product.

Comparator

No concurrent control; participants had baseline testing and a four-hour 15 L/min medical-air period without H₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Symptoms and adverse events, vital signs, spirometry, ECG/telemetry, neurologic examination, Mini-Mental State Examination and hematologic, renal, hepatic, pancreatic and cardiac laboratory tests.

Reported result

No clinically significant adverse event or organ-injury signal was observed. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, neurologic scores and most laboratory measures were unchanged; small heart-rate, peak-flow, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet and chloride changes were judged clinically insignificant.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, protocol, tables, figures and disclosures were checked for gas composition and flow, duration cohorts, positive and null safety findings, limitations, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Only eight young healthy adults, single arm, no blinding and insufficient power to detect uncommon harms or establish safety in patients. Serum H₂ was not measured. The Pappendick Family award, Harvard Catalyst, NIH/NCATS and Harvard-affiliated institutions supported the work; authors disclosed no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Short phase-one-style tolerability evidence in healthy young adults at this exact mixture and high-flow protocol; it does not establish clinical benefit or safety in ill or older populations.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 34651133 · DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000543

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.