Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen gas with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves survival after prolonged cardiac arrest in rats

Yin T, Becker LB, Choudhary RC, Takegawa R, Shoaib M, Shinozaki K, Endo Y, Homma K, Rolston DM, Eguchi S, Ariyoshi T, Matsumoto A, Oka K, Takahashi M, Aoki T, Miyara SJ, Nishikimi M, Sasaki J, Kim J, Molmenti EP, Hayashida K. · Journal of Translational Medicine. 2021;19:462.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2021
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized rat cardiac-arrest/ECPR experiment with blinded laboratory assays

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male Sprague-Dawley rats after 20 minutes of asphyxial cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Sample

Survival groups used n=9 each. Outcome-specific subgroups used n=3 for EEG, n=7 for brain oxygenation and n=8 for mediator/metabolomic analyses.

Duration

Experimental gas during ECPR and for the first 60 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation; total follow-up four hours.

Intervention

2% H₂ with 98% O₂ supplied through both the ECMO membrane oxygenator and mechanical ventilator from ECPR initiation through the first hour after return of spontaneous circulation.

Hydrogen form

2% H₂ with 98% O₂ — not Brown's gas because the H₂:O₂ proportions were not 2:1.

H₂ specification

Gas concentrations were reported, but source flow through the oxygenator and ventilator was not. ECMO blood-flow values are not gas-supply flows and are not used to infer H₂/O₂ mL/min.

H₂ flow

Not reported — gas-supply flow is absent.

O₂ delivered with H₂

98% O₂; mL/min flow not reported because gas-supply flow is absent.

Comparator

ECPR and mechanical ventilation with 100% O₂, followed in both groups by 60% O₂ for the remaining three hours.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Four-hour survival, coma reflexes, EEG recovery, brain tissue oxygenation, hemodynamics, endothelial-injury marker syndecan-1, cytokines and plasma metabolomics.

Reported result

Four-hour survival was 7/9 with H₂ versus 2/9 with placebo, and EEG recovery and several cerebral, hemodynamic, endothelial and metabolic measures favored H₂. MAP, heart rate, temperature, arterial lactate, PaO₂, PaCO₂ and pH did not show confirmed between-group differences in the reported early period.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article and supplements were checked for randomization, all exposure paths/timing, missing gas flow, outcome-specific samples, positive and null physiological results, assay blinding, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Very small lethal male-rat model, unblinded H₂ administration, only four-hour follow-up, limited behavioral neurological assessment, multiple exploratory biomarkers and no dose/timing comparison. Institutional/departmental funds and a ZOLL Foundation grant were reported; several authors were affiliated with Miyarisan Pharmaceutical, although authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Experimental cardiac arrest treated with ECPR in rats; it does not establish survival benefit in human ECMO/ECPR care.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 34781966 · DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03129-1

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article, supplementary methods/tables and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10