Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-rich bath with nano-sized bubbles improves antioxidant capacity based on oxygen radical absorbing and inflammation levels in human serum

Tanaka Y, Xiao L, Miwa N. · Medical Gas Research. 2022;12(3):91–99.

HumanOther formsPublished 2022Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Six healthy volunteers and nine people with heterogeneous inflammatory, connective-tissue or other diseases.

Intervention and dose

A 200 L bath at 40°C was typically electrolyzed for 60 minutes, followed by a 10-minute bath repeated daily in longer observations. · The apparatus produced approximately 150 µg/L dissolved H₂ after 30 minutes and approximately 250 µg/L after 60 minutes; the article also reports 338–682 µg/L under 120-minute/other measured conditions. Mean bubble diameter was 110±10 nm.

Duration

Ten-minute short-term baths; uncontrolled daily use ranged from 9 days to 25 months.

Reported result

Within the n=3 hydrogen-bath healthy group, antioxidant capacity increased at later measurements, but the article states there was no significant between-group difference versus the n=3 normal-water group. CRP changes and declines in the nine heterogeneous patient observations were uncontrolled; visible symptom changes were descriptive and cannot establish treatment effects.

Main limitation

Extremely small healthy comparison (n=3 per arm), heterogeneous uncontrolled patient cases, variable duration and surrogate/descriptive outcomes. The device was the commercial Lita Life Ver. 2 and one author was affiliated with the Institute for Hydrogen Medicine. Funding was a corporate grant (No. 1705) to the Japanese Center for Anti-Aging Medical Sciences; authors declared no conflict of interest.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Exploratory controlled healthy-volunteer experiment plus uncontrolled case series

Research topic

Immune and inflammatory conditions

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Six healthy volunteers and nine people with heterogeneous inflammatory, connective-tissue or other diseases.

Sample

Healthy short-term experiment: 3 normal-water and 3 hydrogen-bath participants. Uncontrolled patient observations: 3 connective-tissue cases followed 9 days–4 months and 6 heterogeneous cases followed 2–25 months.

Duration

Ten-minute short-term baths; uncontrolled daily use ranged from 9 days to 25 months.

Intervention

A 200 L bath at 40°C was typically electrolyzed for 60 minutes, followed by a 10-minute bath repeated daily in longer observations.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved as nano-bubbles in bath water — topical exposure, not inhaled or swallowed and not Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

The apparatus produced approximately 150 µg/L dissolved H₂ after 30 minutes and approximately 250 µg/L after 60 minutes; the article also reports 338–682 µg/L under 120-minute/other measured conditions. Mean bubble diameter was 110±10 nm.

Comparator

Normal-water bath for the six-person short-term experiment; no parallel controls for the nine patient observations.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Serum oxygen-radical absorption capacity, C-reactive protein and descriptive photographs/symptoms in selected cases.

Reported result

Within the n=3 hydrogen-bath healthy group, antioxidant capacity increased at later measurements, but the article states there was no significant between-group difference versus the n=3 normal-water group. CRP changes and declines in the nine heterogeneous patient observations were uncontrolled; visible symptom changes were descriptive and cannot establish treatment effects.

Extraction completeness

The complete PubMed Central article, participant flow, figures, H₂ and O₂ measurements, within- versus between-group tests, case observations, funding and conflict declaration were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Extremely small healthy comparison (n=3 per arm), heterogeneous uncontrolled patient cases, variable duration and surrogate/descriptive outcomes. The device was the commercial Lita Life Ver. 2 and one author was affiliated with the Institute for Hydrogen Medicine. Funding was a corporate grant (No. 1705) to the Japanese Center for Anti-Aging Medical Sciences; authors declared no conflict of interest.

Applies directly to

Exploratory topical-bath observations only; not reliable evidence of clinical efficacy for inflammatory or connective-tissue diseases.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 34854419 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.330692

Publisher access

Free full article on PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed metadata and complete PubMed Central article; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.