Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Effects of hydrogen water and psychological treatment in a sample of women with panic disorder: a randomized and controlled clinical trial

Fernández-Serrano AB, Moya-Faz FJ, Giner Alegría CA, Fernández Rodríguez JC, Soriano Guilabert JF, del Toro Mellado M. · Health Psychology Research. 2022;10(2):35468.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2022
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized placebo-controlled parallel trial with cognitive-behavioral therapy in both groups

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

H₂-rich water

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Women aged 19–64 years with panic disorder treated at two mental-health centers in Murcia, Spain; several participants had comorbid anxiety or chronic inflammatory conditions.

Sample

25 women completed the study: hydrogen-water plus psychological treatment n=12 and placebo water plus the same psychological treatment n=13.

Duration

Three months; twelve weekly psychological-treatment sessions.

Intervention

1.5 L/day of generator-produced hydrogen-rich water, divided into six 250 mL portions, alongside twelve weekly 90-minute group cognitive-behavioral-therapy sessions.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in drinking water — H₂ only, not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

The article reports approximately 1.2 ppm dissolved H₂ and oxidation-reduction potential of −550 mV. Water was stored in aluminum bottles and the article states that properties were retained for up to 8 hours.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — drinking water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

Normal water from visually similar placebo generators plus the same group cognitive-behavioral treatment.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Anxiety, depression, perceived stress, gastrointestinal symptoms, SF-36 health domains, pro-inflammatory cytokines and salivary cortisol-awakening response.

Reported result

The article's main between-group conclusion was negative: adding hydrogen-rich water was not significantly better than placebo water. All six reported cytokine between-group tests were non-significant (p=0.30–0.92). Numerical cytokine reductions and some physical-health/body-pain measures favored the H₂ group, while pooled within-group improvements largely reflected psychological treatment and cannot be attributed to H₂.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete open-access article, randomization, water preparation and dose, psychological co-intervention, outcome tables, null between-group result, registry timing, affiliations and conflict statement were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Very small women-only trial, two centers, many outcomes, baseline imbalances and a strong cognitive-behavioral co-intervention that prevents isolating most within-group changes. Registration was retrospective. One author was manager of Osmostar Soriano S.L., and the article acknowledged the hydrogen company even though the authors declared no competing interests; this commercial connection is retained explicitly.

Applies directly to

Women with panic disorder receiving the reported psychological program; the study did not demonstrate added clinical benefit from hydrogen-rich water.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 35774917 · DOI: 10.52965/001c.35468

Publisher access

Open-access publisher article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Complete PubMed Central/publisher article, PubMed metadata and reported trial registration; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10