Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

High-concentration hydrogen mitigates sepsis-induced acute lung injury in mice by alleviating mitochondrial fission and dysfunction

Zhang N et al. · J Pers Med. 2023;13(2):244.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2023
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized six-group mouse cecal-ligation-and-puncture experiment comparing low- and high-concentration H₂

Research topic

Critical care and ischemia-reperfusion

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Mice with moderate or severe polymicrobial sepsis

Sample

Six groups of 60 mice; survival cohorts used n=20/group and principal tissue assays commonly used n=6/group

Duration

Two 1-hour inhalations; outcomes at 24 hours and survival through 7 days

Intervention

2% or 67% H₂ inhalation for 1 hour at 1 and 6 hours after surgery

Hydrogen form

The 67% intervention was Brown’s gas / oxyhydrogen generated at approximately 2:1 H₂:O₂. The 2% intervention was separately mixed low-concentration H₂.

H₂ specification

Low-concentration arm: 2% H₂ with O₂ maintained at 33%, total flow 4 L/min. High-concentration arm: 67% H₂ oxyhydrogen; total high-concentration flow was not reported.

H₂ flow

Low arm: 80 mL/min H₂, calculated from 2% of the reported 4 L/min mixture. High Brown’s-gas arm: H₂ flow not reported.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Low arm: O₂ maintained at 33% (about 1,320 mL/min if applied to the reported 4 L/min total flow). High arm: approximately 33% O₂, but O₂ flow was not reported.

Comparator

Moderate- and severe-sepsis groups breathing control air/oxygen, plus sham

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, lung, liver and kidney injury, inflammation, oxidative balance and mitochondrial structure and function

Reported result

The article reports improved survival and organ-injury measures with both concentrations, with several outcomes favoring 67% H₂. Mitochondrial membrane potential improved but was not fully normalized, and complex II activity did not significantly change.

Results-extraction completeness

Allocation, gas preparation, low-flow value, high-concentration Brown’s-gas identity, principal positive and null results, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Large but highly partitioned preclinical experiment with short treatment and many outcomes. High-concentration flow was not disclosed; low-arm component flows are calculations from total mixture flow.

Applies directly to

Cecal-ligation-and-puncture sepsis in mice, not clinical sepsis or acute lung injury.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 36836478 · DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020244

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC/publisher full text and PubMed record; no retraction or expression of concern was shown in the checked records on 7 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10