The Benefit of Hydrogen Gas as an Adjunctive Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Liu SF, Li CL, Lee HC, Chang HC, Liu JF, Kuo HC. · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2024;60(2):245.
What kind of evidence is this?
Human
Human interventional or observational study
Respiratory health
Other forms
Not reported in this record.
Not reported in this record.
Methods at a glance
Human participants studied for respiratory health. See eligibility criteria in the linked full text.
Human study; the article does not state one consolidated sample total, so no total is inferred.
30 days
Full text reports another explicitly administered H₂ intervention. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 30 days, 73%, 27%, 6 min, 30 min.
another explicitly administered H₂ intervention — H₂ only unless the full text explicitly reports oxygen co-delivery.
H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 30 days, 73%, 27%, 6 min, 30 min. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.
Not applicable — no inhaled H₂ intervention was identified in the full article.
No inhaled O₂ co-delivery was identified for this non-inhalation intervention.
Control or comparison condition reported in the full article; see the linked methods for arm-specific details.
Outcomes and reported result
survival or mortality, clinical symptoms or functional scores, tumor growth or cancer markers, inflammation and cytokines, oxidative-stress and antioxidant markers, apoptosis or cell injury
Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “260 (232.75–314.5); p = 0.043] ([Table 3], [Figure 2]), respectively, while other blood tests, inflammation markers, and oxidative stress markers did not show significant…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.
The complete machine-readable article was checked for source identity, methods, intervention quantities, results, tables, funding and conflict declarations. This public record is based on the full article.
A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.
Cautions and applicability
Human evidence; design, sample size and comparator limit interpretation. No funding statement was identified in the machine-readable full article; absence is not inferred. No explicit conflict statement was identified in the machine-readable full article; absence is not inferred.
Applies only to the population and protocol reported in this respiratory health article.
Not reported in this record.
Not reported in this record.
Not reported in this record.
No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.
Sources and record status
PMID: 38399533 · DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020245
A free full article is available through PubMed Central.
Official Europe PMC JATS full article and PubMed/PMC identifiers; structured full-text extraction and validation completed 8 August 2026.
2026-08-10