Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-Rich Saline Combined With Vacuum Sealing Drainage Promotes Wound Healing by Altering Biotin Metabolism

Kuang X, Liang Z, Xia Y, Shan M, Hao Y, Liu H, Wang Z, He Q, Xia C, Feng C, Chang G, Wang Y. · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2025;29(1):e70292.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2025Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Rabbits with experimental full-thickness skin wounds and cultured HaCaT human keratinocytes.

Intervention and dose

Each wound received freshly prepared hydrogen-rich saline irrigation for 3 minutes three times daily for 7 days, with or without 125 mmHg vacuum-sealing drainage for 2 hours/day. · Saline was hydrogenated in 280 mL under 0.4 MPa and used immediately; the article does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration.

Duration

Seven days of treatment; wound closure followed through day 14.

Reported result

The combination group showed higher wound-healing rates than control and saline groups on days 4–10 and a small difference versus vacuum drainage plus saline on day 10 (99.997% versus 98.848%, p=0.0484). Complete-closure time differed versus control and was shorter than vacuum drainage plus saline (p=0.038). Metabolomic and cell analyses implicated biotin/energy and oxidative-stress pathways, but they do not prove a human clinical mechanism.

Main limitation

Animal and cell evidence only despite human keratinocyte indexing. Small groups, many outcomes, assay subsets and a modest day-10 between-treatment difference. Hydrogen concentration was not measured numerically. Nanobubble Technology supplied the hydrogen-generating bottles. Funding came from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (2022-PUMCH-B-040); authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled rabbit full-thickness-wound experiment plus keratinocyte experiments and untargeted metabolomics

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Rabbits with experimental full-thickness skin wounds and cultured HaCaT human keratinocytes.

Sample

30 rabbits randomized to five groups of six; tissue/metabolomic assays used subsets. Separate HaCaT experiments were also performed.

Duration

Seven days of treatment; wound closure followed through day 14.

Intervention

Each wound received freshly prepared hydrogen-rich saline irrigation for 3 minutes three times daily for 7 days, with or without 125 mmHg vacuum-sealing drainage for 2 hours/day.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline — topical irrigation, not inhalation, swallowed water or Brown's gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

Saline was hydrogenated in 280 mL under 0.4 MPa and used immediately; the article does not report a measured numerical dissolved-H₂ concentration.

Comparator

Untreated control, ordinary-saline irrigation, hydrogen-rich saline alone and vacuum drainage plus ordinary saline.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Wound-healing rate and closure time, histology, inflammatory and oxidative markers, metabolomics, biotin-pathway measures and keratinocyte proliferation/migration.

Reported result

The combination group showed higher wound-healing rates than control and saline groups on days 4–10 and a small difference versus vacuum drainage plus saline on day 10 (99.997% versus 98.848%, p=0.0484). Complete-closure time differed versus control and was shorter than vacuum drainage plus saline (p=0.038). Metabolomic and cell analyses implicated biotin/energy and oxidative-stress pathways, but they do not prove a human clinical mechanism.

Extraction completeness

The complete Wiley/PMC article, rabbit allocation, H₂ preparation, treatment schedule, figures, null and positive comparisons, metabolomics, cell work, funding and conflicts were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Animal and cell evidence only despite human keratinocyte indexing. Small groups, many outcomes, assay subsets and a modest day-10 between-treatment difference. Hydrogen concentration was not measured numerically. Nanobubble Technology supplied the hydrogen-generating bottles. Funding came from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (2022-PUMCH-B-040); authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Experimental rabbit wounds and cultured keratinocytes; not evidence for wound treatment in patients.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39804806 · DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70292

Publisher access

Open-access publisher article and PubMed Central copy.

Extraction basis

Wiley publisher full article, PubMed Central copy and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.