Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Sustained-release photothermal microneedles for postoperative incisional analgesia and wound healing via hydrogen therapy

Zhang A, Jiang X, Xiong B, Chen J, Liu X, Wang S, Li B, Peng M, Li W. · Advanced Science. 2025;12(35):e03698.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Multi-component biomaterial study with cell assays and randomized ten-group rat plantar-incision experiments

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male Sprague–Dawley rats with plantar incisions, plus HUVEC and NIH-3T3 cell models.

Sample

Ten rat groups of n=8 for pain testing; selected wound histology used n=3 and body-weight reporting used n=16. Cell assays commonly used three independent experiments.

Duration

Single post-incision patch with pain follow-up to seven days, weight to 15 days and wound/histology assessment on days 5–7.

Intervention

A dissolving microneedle patch delivered ammonia-borane-loaded PDA@ZIF-8 nanoparticles for local sustained H₂ release, with some groups also receiving QX-314 microspheres and near-infrared activation.

Hydrogen form

H₂ generated locally from ammonia borane in an acid-responsive microneedle material — not Brown's gas, not inhalation and not H₂ water.

H₂ specification

Ten mg particles released H₂ in a 4-mL probe solution for up to 120 hours in vitro, plateauing by 120–168 hours; the article did not provide a clinically interpretable local H₂ concentration or mL/min flux in tissue.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — local chemical sustained release; no gas flow in mL/min was administered.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-administered.

Comparator

Surgery alone, blank/non-H₂ microneedles, multiple H₂/QX-314/NIR combinations, H₂-containing gel and subcutaneous morphine.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Mechanical/thermal withdrawal, wound closure/collagen/CD31, cell migration/angiogenesis, transcriptomics, local/systemic biocompatibility and material release.

Reported result

H₂-releasing patch groups showed longer pain-threshold and wound-healing improvements than surgery/non-H₂ controls; the combined H₂/QX-314/NIR system performed best, so its effect cannot be assigned to H₂ alone. Body weight and tested liver/kidney/histology safety measures did not differ adversely; multiple cell/assay comparisons were non-significant.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, multi-component methods, figures, release/behavior/wound/safety sections and disclosures were checked for group structure, local H₂ generation and missing tissue dose, H₂-only versus combined effects, null safety findings, limitations, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Complex experimental patch, many treatment arms/endpoints, small histology samples, male rats only, H₂ exposure not quantified in tissue, and strong confounding by QX-314/NIR in the best-performing arm. Chinese public/institutional grants funded the work; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Prototype postoperative patch in rats; it does not establish human analgesic efficacy, wound benefit, dose or long-term material safety.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 40548456 · DOI: 10.1002/advs.202503698

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10