Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen inhalation therapy alone may not alleviate intestinal mucosal damage in NOMI without total‐layer necrosis: An experimental swine model study

Tanaka Y, Matsumura Y, Hayashi Y, Aoki M, Izawa Y, Endo K, Mato T. · Acute medicine & surgery. 2025;12(1):e70072.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled preclinical study

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Laboratory model used to study cardiovascular and circulatory health.

Sample

Preclinical study; the full text reports 64 animals, with group/assay counts including n=4.

Duration

Multiple article-specific time points; see the linked full methods.

Intervention

Full text reports inhaled H₂-containing gas. Detected intervention quantities or schedules: 4%, 96%, 2%, 50%, 25%.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂ at 4%; oxygen co-delivery is reported.

H₂ specification

H₂-related quantities reported in the intervention passages: 4%, 96%, 2%, 50%, 25%. Values are not combined across different experimental arms.

H₂ flow

Not reported in the full article — an absolute H₂ flow in mL/min could not be verified.

O₂ delivered with H₂

25% O₂ reported; total flow is absent, so O₂ flow in mL/min cannot be calculated.

Comparator

Control or comparison condition reported in the full article; see the linked methods for arm-specific details.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

survival or mortality, clinical symptoms or functional scores, oxidative-stress and antioxidant markers, apoptosis or cell injury, cardiovascular measures, respiratory measures

Reported result

Article-reported result excerpt (24 words maximum): “In the control group at 10 cm and in the hydrogen group at 10 cm ( p < 0.001), 100 cm ( p =…” This excerpt is not a complete result summary; consult the linked full text for all positive and null findings.

Results-extraction completeness

The complete machine-readable article was checked for source identity, methods, intervention quantities, results, tables, funding and conflict declarations. This public record is based on the full article.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Preclinical evidence only; findings do not establish a treatment effect in people. Funding or grant information is reported in the full article. No explicit conflict statement was identified in the machine-readable full article; absence is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Applies to the reported animal, cell or tissue model, not directly to patients.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 40626114 · DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70072

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official Europe PMC JATS full article and PubMed/PMC identifiers; structured full-text extraction and validation completed 8 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10