Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Effects of Hydrogen Water Gargling on Oral Mucositis and Pain in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Tsai HT et al. · Integr Cancer Ther. 2026;25:15347354261463550.

HumanOther formsPublished 2026
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Single-center, single-blind, parallel randomized controlled pilot trial

Research topic

Oral and dental health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy and experiencing oral mucositis

Sample

31 analyzed: H₂-water n=16; distilled-water n=15

Duration

2 weeks; assessments at baseline and days 1, 3, 7 and 14

Intervention

Gargling with 20 mL nano-hydrogen water for 30–60 seconds every 4 hours, at least 3 times/day

Hydrogen form

H₂ dispersed in water as nanobubbles for oral gargling — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

Mean nanobubble diameter about 145 nm and concentration 2.79–4.89 × 10⁸ bubbles/mL within 1 hour of preparation; the article does not report dissolved H₂ in mg/L or ppm.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — gargled water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

20 mL distilled water gargled on the same schedule plus usual care

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

WHO oral-mucositis grade, pain, oral frailty and head-and-neck-cancer quality of life

Reported result

The paper reports improvements in oral-mucositis grade, pain and quality of life in the H₂-water arm; oral frailty did not differ. The displayed analyses emphasize within-group changes, and baseline mucositis severity was imbalanced.

Results-extraction completeness

Intervention, main results, limitations and access status checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Only 31 analyzed participants, single blinding, two-week follow-up, multiple outcomes and an important baseline imbalance: grade-4 mucositis occurred only in the H₂-water group. The article’s tables emphasize within-group tests, which do not by themselves establish a between-group effect.

Applies directly to

Head and neck cancer patients with treatment-related oral mucositis under the study’s gargling protocol; not prevention or treatment of other oral conditions.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 42338291 · DOI: 10.1177/15347354261463550

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC and the publisher.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed record.

Record revision

2026-08-10