Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

The effect of hydrogen inhalation on temporary threshold shift following simultaneous exposure to noise and carbon monoxide in guinea pigs

Bagheri F, Pourbakht A, Raisi A, Kamali M, Faridan M. · Health Scope. 2018;7(4):e55353.

PreclinicalInhaled H₂Published 2018
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled guinea-pig study

Research topic

Other neurological conditions

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Positive preclinical signal at selected frequencies.

Outcome type

Electrophysiological hearing outcomes in animals.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Guinea pigs exposed simultaneously to noise and carbon monoxide.

Sample

12 animals; two groups.

Duration

Acute exposure and immediate post-exposure testing.

Intervention

2% hydrogen inhalation after combined noise and carbon-monoxide exposure.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled H₂-containing gas.

H₂ specification

2% H₂.

H₂ flow

Exposure-system flow is reported in the full methods.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Carrier-gas conditions were checked in the article.

Comparator

Noise-plus-carbon-monoxide exposure without H₂.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Auditory brainstem response thresholds at 2, 4, 8 and 16 kHz.

Reported result

Post-exposure thresholds favored H₂ at 4, 8 and 16 kHz; the 2-kHz comparison was not reported as significant.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article methods, intervention, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Very small animal study with immediate surrogate testing only.

Applies directly to

The reported acute combined-exposure model only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Random division was stated, but concealment and blinded threshold assessment were not established.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.55353 · DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.55353

Publisher access

A free publisher or repository full article was checked.

Extraction basis

Publisher or repository full article and bibliographic record; checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10