Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Supplementation of hydrogen-rich water improves lipid and glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance

Kajiyama S, Hasegawa G, Asano M, Hosoda H, Fukui M, Nakamura N, Kitawaki J, Imai S, Nakano K, Ohta M, Adachi T, Obayashi H, Yoshikawa T. · Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.). 2008;28(3):137–143.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2008Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

A small crossover trial found changes in selected blood-fat and oxidation markers. Fasting glucose, HbA1c and insulin resistance did not significantly improve. An exploratory six-person glucose-tolerance finding does not establish diabetes prevention.

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

30 people with mild type 2 diabetes managed by diet/exercise and six with impaired glucose tolerance. Eighteen men and eighteen women; age 58.6 ± 4.7 years, BMI 23.4 ± 3.5 kg/m². Twelve used stable antihypertensive medicines and three low-dose lipid medicines.

Intervention and dose

900 mL/day purified hydrogen water for eight weeks, supplied by I’rom Pharmaceutical in unlabelled 300 mL aluminum pouches. · Dissolved H₂ 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/L; pH 6.7 ± 0.1; dissolved O₂ 0.8 ± 0.2 mg/L.

Duration

Two eight-week periods separated by twelve weeks.

Reported result

Within the hydrogen period, modified electronegative LDL changed from 8.4 ± 7.2 to 7.1 ± 5.6 (15.5%, P < 0.01), small-dense LDL from 1.05 ± 0.25 to 0.99 ± 0.17 mmol/L (5.7%, P < 0.05), and urinary 8-isoprostane from 257 ± 154 to 240 ± 127 pg/mg creatinine (6.6%, P < 0.05). Placebo changes were nonsignificant; precise placebo-adjusted estimates/interaction P values and confidence intervals were not supplied. Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, total/HDL/LDL cholesterol, RLP, triglycerides, free fatty acids, homocysteine, leptin, resistin, hsCRP, BMI and blood pressure did not significantly change. Oxidized LDL P = 0.0567, EC-SOD P = 0.0871 and adiponectin P = 0.0577 were nonsignificant. Four of six IGT participants changed to normal OGTT classification; two-hour glucose 9.36 ± 0.91 to 7.33 ± 1.17 mmol/L (P = 0.0010), one-hour insulin 270.1 ± 206.9 to 423.8 ± 246.2 pmol/L (P = 0.0329), insulinogenic index unchanged. No placebo-period OGTT comparator was shown. In ten healthy volunteers, breath H₂ after 300 mL peaked at 56.8 ± 27.8 ppm at 15 minutes and returned to baseline 11.2 ± 6.5 ppm at 150 minutes; this is not universal tissue-retention time.

Main limitation

Small selected population, many surrogate endpoints, limited allocation and carryover/sequence detail. Table significance markers are within-period comparisons. No demonstrated diabetes-prevention, cardiovascular or other patient-important benefit.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in Japan, with two eight-week periods separated by a twelve-week washout.

Research topic

Metabolic and lipid health

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

30 people with mild type 2 diabetes managed by diet/exercise and six with impaired glucose tolerance. Eighteen men and eighteen women; age 58.6 ± 4.7 years, BMI 23.4 ± 3.5 kg/m². Twelve used stable antihypertensive medicines and three low-dose lipid medicines.

Sample

36 participants received both conditions, not 72 independent participants. Six formed the exploratory impaired-glucose-tolerance subgroup. A separate breath-kinetics substudy involved ten healthy fasting volunteers; they are not added to the therapeutic trial sample. Separate attrition accounting was not reported.

Duration

Two eight-week periods separated by twelve weeks.

Intervention

900 mL/day purified hydrogen water for eight weeks, supplied by I’rom Pharmaceutical in unlabelled 300 mL aluminum pouches.

Hydrogen form

Hydrogen-rich water

Dose or H₂ specification

Dissolved H₂ 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/L; pH 6.7 ± 0.1; dissolved O₂ 0.8 ± 0.2 mg/L.

Comparator

900 mL/day placebo purified water for eight weeks; twelve-week washout. Diet plans, weekly diaries, four-week activity/condition checks and unchanged medicines.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Multiple lipid, glucose, oxidation and insulin-resistance biomarkers; no single primary endpoint explicitly declared. OGTT was reported before/after hydrogen water in the six-person subgroup.

Reported result

Within the hydrogen period, modified electronegative LDL changed from 8.4 ± 7.2 to 7.1 ± 5.6 (15.5%, P < 0.01), small-dense LDL from 1.05 ± 0.25 to 0.99 ± 0.17 mmol/L (5.7%, P < 0.05), and urinary 8-isoprostane from 257 ± 154 to 240 ± 127 pg/mg creatinine (6.6%, P < 0.05). Placebo changes were nonsignificant; precise placebo-adjusted estimates/interaction P values and confidence intervals were not supplied. Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, total/HDL/LDL cholesterol, RLP, triglycerides, free fatty acids, homocysteine, leptin, resistin, hsCRP, BMI and blood pressure did not significantly change. Oxidized LDL P = 0.0567, EC-SOD P = 0.0871 and adiponectin P = 0.0577 were nonsignificant. Four of six IGT participants changed to normal OGTT classification; two-hour glucose 9.36 ± 0.91 to 7.33 ± 1.17 mmol/L (P = 0.0010), one-hour insulin 270.1 ± 206.9 to 423.8 ± 246.2 pmol/L (P = 0.0329), insulinogenic index unchanged. No placebo-period OGTT comparator was shown. In ten healthy volunteers, breath H₂ after 300 mL peaked at 56.8 ± 27.8 ppm at 15 minutes and returned to baseline 11.2 ± 6.5 ppm at 150 minutes; this is not universal tissue-retention time.

Extraction completeness

Main-text methods, results, limitations and declarations were reviewed. Source versions, missing information and conflicting findings are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

No dedicated systematic adverse-event results were identified; absent reporting does not establish absence of harm.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small selected population, many surrogate endpoints, limited allocation and carryover/sequence detail. Table significance markers are within-period comparisons. No demonstrated diabetes-prevention, cardiovascular or other patient-important benefit.

Applies directly to

Limited to the population/model and protocol described above. These findings do not provide a treatment, concentration or device recommendation.

Funding and support

No dedicated funding statement identified. Acknowledgments thank Hiroshige Itakura for guidance; I’rom Pharmaceutical supplied the water.

Conflicts of interest

No dedicated competing-interest declaration identified.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Cochrane RoB 2 crossover variant · reported metabolic biomarker results

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Cannot be fully assessed — abstract only

Appraisal rationale

The abstract confirms a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, but does not provide enough detail for domain-level judgements or carryover and period-effect checks.

Appraisal domains

Randomization reported; sequence generation and concealment unavailable. · Double blinding reported; deviations and adherence unavailable. · Missing-data handling unavailable. · Laboratory outcomes are less subjective, but measurement procedures are unavailable. · Protocol, analysis plan, carryover assessment and full outcome reporting are unavailable.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 19083400 · DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.01.008

Publisher access

Complete final journal article, Nutrition Research 28(3), 137–143, seven pages, hosted by NuLifeSciences.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

Pages 137–143: Introduction; Methods 2.1–2.6; Results 3.1–3.2; Tables 1–3 and Figures 1–2/captions; Discussion; Acknowledgment and references.

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete final journal article, Nutrition Research 28(3), 137–143, seven pages, hosted by NuLifeSciences.

Registry / related-source limitations

No registration reported in the article.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.