Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-rich saline attenuated neuropathic pain by reducing oxidative stress

Chen Q, Chen P, Zhou S, Yan X, Zhang J, Sun X, Yuan H, Yu W. · Can J Neurol Sci. 2013;40(6):857–863.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2013Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Sprague-Dawley rats with chronic constriction injury.

Intervention and dose

Intrathecal hydrogen-rich saline, 100 μL/kg daily on days 1–7. · At least 0.6 mmol/L dissolved H₂.

Duration

Seven treatment days with behavioral follow-up through day 14.

Reported result

Withdrawal thresholds and several oxidative and signaling measures favored hydrogen-rich saline; P2X4R did not differ.

Main limitation

Animal evidence only; multiple outcomes and limited blinding information.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized controlled rat study

Research topic

Musculoskeletal and pain research

Administration form

Other forms

Study result signal

Mixed positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Behavioral and spinal-cord biomarker outcomes in a neuropathic-pain model.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Sprague-Dawley rats with chronic constriction injury.

Sample

30 rats; three groups of 10.

Duration

Seven treatment days with behavioral follow-up through day 14.

Intervention

Intrathecal hydrogen-rich saline, 100 μL/kg daily on days 1–7.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline.

Dose or H₂ specification

At least 0.6 mmol/L dissolved H₂.

Comparator

Sham and constriction-injury groups receiving physiological saline.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Mechanical withdrawal threshold, spinal oxidative markers and p38 MAPK, BDNF and P2X4R expression.

Reported result

Withdrawal thresholds and several oxidative and signaling measures favored hydrogen-rich saline; P2X4R did not differ.

Extraction completeness

The full article methods, intervention, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Animal evidence only; multiple outcomes and limited blinding information.

Applies directly to

The reported rat constriction-injury model only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Random allocation was stated, but concealment and blinded outcome assessment were not established.

Appraisal domains

Sequence generation checked where reported · Allocation concealment generally unclear · Personnel blinding generally unclear · Outcome-assessor blinding generally unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 24257230 · DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100016024

Publisher access

A free publisher or repository full article was checked.

Extraction basis

Publisher or repository full article and bibliographic record; checked 10 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.