Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen treatment protects against cell death and senescence induced by oxidative damage

Han AL, Park SH, Park MS. · J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27(2):365–371.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled cell-culture study

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Positive cell-culture signal.

Outcome type

Cell viability, senescence and oxidative-stress outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Murine embryonic fibroblasts exposed to oxidative or replicative stress.

Sample

Three to four independent measurements for reported assays.

Duration

Four hours to eight days depending on assay.

Intervention

Hydrogen nanoparticle water added to cell culture.

Hydrogen form

H₂ nanoparticles dispersed in water and culture medium.

H₂ specification

Reported concentrations approximately 400–1,800 ppb across experiments.

H₂ flow

Not applicable.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Conventional culture with or without hydroxyurea or hydrogen peroxide.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Cell proliferation, viability, LDH, senescence, ROS and nuclear morphology.

Reported result

Several viability, proliferation, ROS and senescence measures favored hydrogen-treated cultures.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article methods, intervention, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Cell-only evidence and a nanoparticle preparation with limited independent characterization.

Applies directly to

The tested fibroblast cultures only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

In-vitro study appraisal — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Small replicate counts, multiple assays and generally unreported blinding.

Appraisal domains

Independent replicate reporting checked · Exposure and comparator checked · Assay blinding generally unreported · Multiplicity and selective reporting remain possible · External validity is limited to the tested cells

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 27780950 · DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1608.08011

Publisher access

A free publisher or repository full article was checked.

Extraction basis

Publisher or repository full article and bibliographic record; checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10