Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Hydrogen-containing saline alleviates pressure overload-induced interstitial fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction in rats.

Yang J, Wu S, Zhu L, Cai J, Fu L. · Molecular Medicine Reports. 2017;16:6849.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2017
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled rat study

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Mixed positive preclinical signal.

Outcome type

Animal cardiac functional, tissue and biomarker outcomes.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Male Wistar rats after aortic constriction to model pressure overload.

Sample

Surviving analyzed groups included 7 constriction-control, 7 hydrogen-saline and 8 normal-control rats.

Duration

16 weeks.

Intervention

Hydrogen-containing saline 10 mL/kg intraperitoneally once daily after surgery.

Hydrogen form

H2 dissolved in saline; not Brown's gas.

H₂ specification

Prepared by bubbling H2 at 1 L/min into 500 mL saline for 10 minutes; final concentration was not reported.

H₂ flow

Not applicable to administration — intraperitoneal injection.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No oxygen was co-delivered.

Comparator

Normal and aortic-constriction saline-control groups.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Cardiac function, dimensions, fibrosis, histology and oxidative-stress markers.

Reported result

Ejection fraction, fractional shortening, fibrosis and selected oxidative measures improved, while several cardiac dimensions and ratios did not.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article, survivor counts, methods and significant and null findings were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Small surviving groups and incomplete clarity about post-surgery attrition; animal results do not establish a clinical effect.

Applies directly to

The reported rat pressure-overload model.

Preliminary appraisal framework

SYRCLE animal-study tool — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Some concerns

Appraisal rationale

Post-surgery attrition and unclear concealment and assessor blinding raise concerns.

Appraisal domains

Randomization/allocation reporting is limited · Blinding of personnel is unclear · Attrition is incompletely reported in places · Blinding of outcome assessors is unclear · No prospectively registered analysis plan identified

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28656216 · DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6849

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed record and PubMed Central full text; extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10