Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Protective effects of hydrogen rich water on the intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury due to intestinal intussusception in a rat model

Wu MJ, Chen M, Sang S, Hou LL, Tian ML, Li K, Lv FQ. · Medical Gas Research. 2017;7(2):101–106.

PreclinicalH₂-rich waterPublished 2017Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

90 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged seven to nine weeks.

Intervention and dose

Single intraperitoneal injection of H₂-rich water 5 mL/kg immediately after the intestine was relocated following eight hours of intussusception. · Dose was 5 mL/kg. The article names the supplying institute but does not report the dissolved-H₂ concentration or preparation gas flow.

Duration

Eight hours of intussusception, immediate injection after relocation and outcome collection one hour later.

Reported result

Histology and all measured inflammatory, oxidative and cell-death outcomes favored H₂-rich water over saline at one hour. No dose comparison, later functional recovery, obstruction recurrence or survival outcome was reported.

Main limitation

Acute one-hour rat model, only males, no H₂ concentration, no dose/timing optimization, biomarker/histology outcomes and no blinded-assessment statement. Authors declared no conflict; no explicit funding statement was identified, so absence of funding is not inferred.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Randomized three-group rat intestinal-intussusception ischemia/reperfusion experiment

Research topic

Gastrointestinal health

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

90 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged seven to nine weeks.

Sample

90 rats randomized equally: sham n=30, ischemia/reperfusion plus saline n=30 and ischemia/reperfusion plus H₂-rich water n=30; selected histology assays used 10 rats per group.

Duration

Eight hours of intussusception, immediate injection after relocation and outcome collection one hour later.

Intervention

Single intraperitoneal injection of H₂-rich water 5 mL/kg immediately after the intestine was relocated following eight hours of intussusception.

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water and injected intraperitoneally — H₂ only, not Brown's gas, not inhalation and not oral drinking.

Dose or H₂ specification

Dose was 5 mL/kg. The article names the supplying institute but does not report the dissolved-H₂ concentration or preparation gas flow.

Comparator

Equal-volume intraperitoneal normal saline after the same injury, plus sham laparotomy without intussusception.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Intestinal histopathology, serum TNF-α, malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase, TUNEL-positive cells and intestinal 8-OHdG.

Reported result

Histology and all measured inflammatory, oxidative and cell-death outcomes favored H₂-rich water over saline at one hour. No dose comparison, later functional recovery, obstruction recurrence or survival outcome was reported.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, table and figures were checked for randomization, group size, route/dose, absent concentration/flow, outcomes, limitations, funding information and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Acute one-hour rat model, only males, no H₂ concentration, no dose/timing optimization, biomarker/histology outcomes and no blinded-assessment statement. Authors declared no conflict; no explicit funding statement was identified, so absence of funding is not inferred.

Applies directly to

Experimental intestinal intussusception/reperfusion in rats; it does not establish treatment for children or adults with intussusception.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 28744362 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.208515

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.