Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen-rich saline mitigates pressure-overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and atrial fibrillation in rats via the JAK-STAT signalling pathway

Wang C, Pan Z. · J Int Med Res. 2020;48(8):300060520936415.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Rats with pressure overload and cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes with cardiotrophin-1-induced hypertrophy

Intervention and dose

0.6 mmol/L hydrogen-rich saline at 3 or 6 mL/kg intraperitoneally every day; cells received H₂-rich medium · 0.6 mmol/L dissolved H₂.

Duration

Six weeks in the rat experiment

Reported result

The article reports less cardiac hypertrophy, atrial fibrosis and atrial-fibrillation incidence and duration at both H₂-saline doses, with JAK-STAT down-regulation.

Main limitation

Preclinical pressure-overload model with two doses, induced atrial-fibrillation testing and mechanistic cell experiments. Authors declared no conflicts and no specific grant funding. It is not evidence for treating human hypertrophy or atrial fibrillation.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled rat abdominal-aortic-constriction experiment plus cultured cardiomyocyte experiments

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Rats with pressure overload and cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes with cardiotrophin-1-induced hypertrophy

Sample

81 rats: sham n=23, aortic-constriction n=19, low-dose H₂ saline n=19 and high-dose H₂ saline n=20

Duration

Six weeks in the rat experiment

Intervention

0.6 mmol/L hydrogen-rich saline at 3 or 6 mL/kg intraperitoneally every day; cells received H₂-rich medium

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in saline or culture medium — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas and not inhalation.

Dose or H₂ specification

0.6 mmol/L dissolved H₂.

Comparator

Sham, pressure-overload plus ordinary saline and cultured-cell controls

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Heart and atrial weights, atrial-fibrillation inducibility and duration, fibrosis and JAK-STAT signaling

Reported result

The article reports less cardiac hypertrophy, atrial fibrosis and atrial-fibrillation incidence and duration at both H₂-saline doses, with JAK-STAT down-regulation.

Extraction completeness

The complete open-access article was checked for concentration, allocation, doses, duration, principal results, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Preclinical pressure-overload model with two doses, induced atrial-fibrillation testing and mechanistic cell experiments. Authors declared no conflicts and no specific grant funding. It is not evidence for treating human hypertrophy or atrial fibrillation.

Applies directly to

Pressure-overload cardiac remodeling in rats and cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32762484 · DOI: 10.1177/0300060520936415

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC/publisher full text and PubMed record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.