Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Hydrogen gas activates coenzyme Q10 to restore exhausted CD8+ T cells, especially PD-1+Tim3+terminal CD8+ T cells, leading to better nivolumab outcomes in patients with lung cancer

Akagi J, Baba H. · Oncology Letters. 2020;20(5):258.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

People with stage IV lung carcinoma treated with nivolumab between July 2016 and July 2018.

Intervention and dose

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg every two weeks plus gas inhalation, usually for 3 hours/day; a few participants inhaled for up to 10 hours/day. · Device output was 1.67 L/min; gas chromatography measured 680,000 ppm H₂ (68%) and 320,000 ppm O₂ (32%).

Duration

Daily inhalation during follow-up; the article describes follow-up/exposure extending as long as 60 months.

Reported result

Median overall survival was reported as 28 months with nivolumab plus gas and 9 months with nivolumab alone. Biomarker analyses linked lower PD-1+Tim-3+ terminal CD8+ T-cell proportions and higher coenzyme Q10 with survival, but not all inhalation participants showed the proposed biomarker direction. These associations do not establish that the gas caused the survival difference.

Main limitation

This was not randomized. The authors state that, after apparent early benefit, investigators preferentially selected combined treatment, creating serious selection and calendar-time bias. Groups were very unequal, biomarker subsets were smaller, and responder/biomarker analyses were exploratory. The safety sentence refers to 56 inhaling patients although only 42 were assigned gas; the inconsistency is unresolved. The article states no funding and the authors declared no competing interests.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Prospective nonrandomized cohort with biomarker analyses

Research topic

Cancer research

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

People with stage IV lung carcinoma treated with nivolumab between July 2016 and July 2018.

Sample

56 participants: 42 received nivolumab plus gas inhalation and 14 received nivolumab alone. Biomarker analyses used smaller subsets.

Duration

Daily inhalation during follow-up; the article describes follow-up/exposure extending as long as 60 months.

Intervention

Nivolumab 1 mg/kg every two weeks plus gas inhalation, usually for 3 hours/day; a few participants inhaled for up to 10 hours/day.

Hydrogen form

Oxyhydrogen/Brown's-gas-type mixture containing H₂ and O₂ — not H₂ alone.

Dose or H₂ specification

Device output was 1.67 L/min; gas chromatography measured 680,000 ppm H₂ (68%) and 320,000 ppm O₂ (32%).

H₂ flow

Approximately 1,136 mL/min H₂, calculated as 68% of the reported 1,670 mL/min total output.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Approximately 534 mL/min O₂, calculated as 32% of the reported 1,670 mL/min total output.

Comparator

Nivolumab without gas inhalation.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Overall survival, progression-free survival, peripheral CD8+ T-cell exhaustion markers and coenzyme Q10.

Reported result

Median overall survival was reported as 28 months with nivolumab plus gas and 9 months with nivolumab alone. Biomarker analyses linked lower PD-1+Tim-3+ terminal CD8+ T-cell proportions and higher coenzyme Q10 with survival, but not all inhalation participants showed the proposed biomarker direction. These associations do not establish that the gas caused the survival difference.

Extraction completeness

The complete PubMed Central article, gas composition and output, treatment allocation, survival analyses, biomarker denominators, safety wording, funding and conflict statements were checked.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

This was not randomized. The authors state that, after apparent early benefit, investigators preferentially selected combined treatment, creating serious selection and calendar-time bias. Groups were very unequal, biomarker subsets were smaller, and responder/biomarker analyses were exploratory. The safety sentence refers to 56 inhaling patients although only 42 were assigned gas; the inconsistency is unresolved. The article states no funding and the authors declared no competing interests.

Applies directly to

Stage IV lung carcinoma treated with nivolumab in this highly selected observational cohort; not evidence that oxyhydrogen treats cancer or improves nivolumab outcomes.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 32994821 · DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12121

Publisher access

Free full article on PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

PubMed metadata and complete PubMed Central article; full-text extraction checked 8 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.