Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Antioxidant activity of hydrogen water mask pack composed of gel-type emulsion and hydrogen generation powder

Kwon HJ, Han SB, Park KW. · International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(24):9731.

HumanOther formsPublished 2020Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Twenty volunteers who passed a 24-hour patch safety screen; the full text does not report age or sex distribution.

Intervention and dose

A gel mask containing 20% H₂-generation powder was mixed immediately before use and applied each morning for four weeks. · Bench testing of 0.1 g powder in 100 mL water found preparation-dependent peaks up to 0.551 ppm H₂ after three hours. The H₂ concentration or release dose of the actual facial mask was not measured or reported.

Duration

Daily morning use for four weeks, assessed at baseline, two weeks and four weeks.

Reported result

At four weeks the H₂-mask side increased moisture by 34.63%, reduced sebum by 24.06% and increased skin density by 18.41%; corresponding reported comparator changes were 16.51%, a 9.55% sebum reduction and 9.93% greater density. The paper reports P<0.01 for selected within- and between-condition comparisons but does not provide a complete endpoint-level numerical table.

Main limitation

Small short cosmetic study, demographic details absent, unclear randomization/blinding, products with different ingredient mixtures, actual facial H₂ exposure unmeasured and mechanistic claims not directly tested. Korean public research grants funded the work; authors declared no conflict.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Four-week within-person split-face cosmetic comparison plus laboratory powder-characterization experiments

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Twenty volunteers who passed a 24-hour patch safety screen; the full text does not report age or sex distribution.

Sample

Twenty participants applied the H₂-generating pack and a commercial comparison pack to opposite sides of the face.

Duration

Daily morning use for four weeks, assessed at baseline, two weeks and four weeks.

Intervention

A gel mask containing 20% H₂-generation powder was mixed immediately before use and applied each morning for four weeks.

Hydrogen form

Locally generated H₂ in a topical gel mask — not Brown's gas, not inhaled and not H₂-rich drinking water.

Dose or H₂ specification

Bench testing of 0.1 g powder in 100 mL water found preparation-dependent peaks up to 0.551 ppm H₂ after three hours. The H₂ concentration or release dose of the actual facial mask was not measured or reported.

Comparator

A commercial mask applied to the opposite side of each participant's face; products differed in multiple ingredients and allocation/blinding were not described.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Facial moisture, sebum and ultrasound-derived skin density; pre-use irritation and microbiological/heavy-metal checks were also described.

Reported result

At four weeks the H₂-mask side increased moisture by 34.63%, reduced sebum by 24.06% and increased skin density by 18.41%; corresponding reported comparator changes were 16.51%, a 9.55% sebum reduction and 9.93% greater density. The paper reports P<0.01 for selected within- and between-condition comparisons but does not provide a complete endpoint-level numerical table.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, figures, methods and disclosures were checked for participant number, split-face exposure, formulation, absence of applied H₂ dose, comparator composition, reported outcomes, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small short cosmetic study, demographic details absent, unclear randomization/blinding, products with different ingredient mixtures, actual facial H₂ exposure unmeasured and mechanistic claims not directly tested. Korean public research grants funded the work; authors declared no conflict.

Applies directly to

Short-term biophysical skin measurements in screened volunteers; it does not establish treatment of skin disease or isolate H₂ from the rest of the formulation.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 33419292 · DOI: 10.3390/ijms21249731

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.