Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Topically Applied Molecular Hydrogen Normalizes Skin Parameters Associated with Oxidative Stress: A Pilot Study

Debkowska N et al. · Antioxidants (Basel). 2025;14(6):729.

HumanOther formsPublished 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Prospective uncontrolled single-arm pilot study

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Healthy adults across three age groups

Sample

15 participants

Duration

4 weeks; final assessment one week after the last treatment

Intervention

Standardized topical facial treatments using freshly generated alkaline hydrogen-rich water

Hydrogen form

H₂ dissolved in water for topical application — H₂ only, not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

Approximately 2.066–2.091 ppm dissolved H₂; pH about 10.38–10.49 and ORP about −204 to −212 mV.

H₂ flow

Not applicable — topical water, not gas inhalation.

O₂ delivered with H₂

No O₂ was co-delivered as part of the intervention.

Comparator

No control group

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Image-derived pores, porphyrins, pigmentation, wrinkles and estimated biological skin age

Reported result

Pore visibility improved significantly, especially in younger participants. Porphyrin change was not statistically significant; other image-derived parameters showed reported changes. No adverse effects were reported.

Results-extraction completeness

Intervention, full results, funding and conflict statement checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Uncontrolled cosmetic pilot with 15 participants, short follow-up, many image-derived outcomes and no clinical disease population. The Medical University of Bialystok funded the study; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Healthy adults receiving the reported topical facial procedure; not treatment of a diagnosed skin disease.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 40563361 · DOI: 10.3390/antiox14060729

Publisher access

Open-access publisher and PMC full texts are available.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC and publisher full texts plus PubMed bibliographic record.

Record revision

2026-08-10