Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Complementary Therapies of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Intermittent Claudication

Ng SY. · 2025.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2025
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Single-patient multimodal case report

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

Inhaled H₂

Study result signal

Indeterminate for molecular hydrogen.

Outcome type

Symptoms, functional observations and vascular or neurological surrogate measures in one patient.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

One adult with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease receiving multiple complementary and standard interventions.

Sample

1 patient.

Duration

Outcomes were collected at differing times about 4–6 months after the intervention package began.

Intervention

Hydrogen gas inhalation for 3–4 hours/day, started after 35 external-counterpulsation sessions, alongside electrical stimulation, a carbon-dioxide footbath, nutraceuticals and lifestyle measures.

Hydrogen form

Inhaled molecular H₂; gas composition was not reported.

H₂ specification

Hydrogen concentration and absolute gas flow were not reported.

H₂ flow

Not reported.

O₂ delivered with H₂

Oxygen co-delivery was not reported.

Comparator

No control; before-and-after clinical course with several simultaneous interventions.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Pain, sleep, walking distance, nerve score, ankle/toe-brachial indices, sudomotor response and laboratory measures.

Reported result

The report describes improvements in pain, sleep, walking distance and selected measurements, but the contribution of hydrogen cannot be separated from the many concurrent interventions.

Results-extraction completeness

The full article was checked for methods, intervention details, outcomes, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts. This record does not imply medical efficacy.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Single uncontrolled case, inconsistent outcome timing and extensive co-intervention confounding; the report cannot support a causal hydrogen claim.

Applies directly to

This individual multimodal case only.

Preliminary appraisal framework

JBI case-report checklist — preliminary

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Critical concerns

Appraisal rationale

No comparator, multiple interventions introduced over time and selective clinical observations create critical confounding.

Appraisal domains

Selection and allocation checked · Confounding and co-interventions remain possible · Missing observations checked where reported · Outcome measurement varies by endpoint · Selective reporting cannot be excluded

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 41228043 · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13212676

Publisher access

A free full article is available through PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Official PubMed Central full article and PubMed bibliographic record; source identity, methods, intervention, results, funding and conflicts checked 10 August 2026.

Record revision

2026-08-10