Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

The effect of hydrogen gas evolution of magnesium implant on the postimplantation mortality of rats

Noviana D, Paramitha D, Ulum MF, Hermawan H. · Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2016;5:9–15.

PreclinicalOther formsPublished 2016Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Preclinical

Population or model

Twenty adult 12-week-old Sprague–Dawley rats receiving porous magnesium implantation or sham surgery.

Intervention and dose

A 0.24–0.26 g porous pure-magnesium tablet was implanted into a femoral bone defect and left to degrade without puncturing the gas cavity. · Implant mass was about 1.7% of rat body weight and explicitly considered high; H₂ production rate, concentration and total volume were not quantified.

Duration

Eighteen days after implantation, with radiography on days 7 and 14 and blood measures on day 7.

Reported result

A large gas cavity formed rapidly, spread from muscle into subcutaneous compartments and all magnesium-implant rats had died by day 18, whereas sham animals survived. Several blood indices changed, while RBC/WBC and other listed measures were not significant. Bone-defect radiodensity change in sham animals was not significant. The design shows harm from this high-burden implant condition, not harm from ordinary therapeutic H₂ exposure.

Main limitation

Small unequal groups, exceptionally large rapidly corroding implant relative to rat mass, gas not chemically sampled/quantified, no gas evacuation and cause of death inferred rather than directly established. Indonesian/Canadian public/institutional support was reported; authors declared no conflicts.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Preclinical

Reported design

Controlled rat femoral-implant safety experiment

Research topic

Musculoskeletal and pain research

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Twenty adult 12-week-old Sprague–Dawley rats receiving porous magnesium implantation or sham surgery.

Sample

Magnesium implant n=15; sham surgery n=5.

Duration

Eighteen days after implantation, with radiography on days 7 and 14 and blood measures on day 7.

Intervention

A 0.24–0.26 g porous pure-magnesium tablet was implanted into a femoral bone defect and left to degrade without puncturing the gas cavity.

Hydrogen form

H₂ generated locally by magnesium corrosion in tissue — not Brown's gas and not inhaled/dissolved H₂ therapy.

Dose or H₂ specification

Implant mass was about 1.7% of rat body weight and explicitly considered high; H₂ production rate, concentration and total volume were not quantified.

Comparator

Identical femoral surgery without magnesium implantation.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Survival, visible/radiographic gas-cavity spread, defect radiodensity and peripheral blood-cell indices.

Reported result

A large gas cavity formed rapidly, spread from muscle into subcutaneous compartments and all magnesium-implant rats had died by day 18, whereas sham animals survived. Several blood indices changed, while RBC/WBC and other listed measures were not significant. Bone-defect radiodensity change in sham animals was not significant. The design shows harm from this high-burden implant condition, not harm from ordinary therapeutic H₂ exposure.

Extraction completeness

The complete free PMC article, methods, figures/table and disclosures were checked for implant burden, group sizes, missing H₂ quantification, mortality/gas distribution, positive and null findings, funding and conflicts.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small unequal groups, exceptionally large rapidly corroding implant relative to rat mass, gas not chemically sampled/quantified, no gas evacuation and cause of death inferred rather than directly established. Indonesian/Canadian public/institutional support was reported; authors declared no conflicts.

Applies directly to

Implant-material safety warning in rats; it does not evaluate inhaled H₂ or ordinary H₂-water exposure.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 30035070 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003

Publisher access

Free full article in PubMed Central.

Extraction basis

Complete PMC article and PubMed metadata; full-text extraction checked 9 August 2026.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.