Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Perioperative Hydrogen Inhalation and Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic Discectomy: A Pilot Non-Randomized Clinical Study with Exploratory Murine Data

Sung CH, Ko WC, Kung CC, Hung CF. · Medicina (Kaunas). 2026;62(9):1785. Published 16 September 2026.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2026Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

A small nonrandomized study found lower pain scores at some time points after hydrogen–oxygen inhalation during spine surgery. Only 25 of 37 enrolled patients could be analyzed: records for 12 hydrogen patients were unavailable. The groups were treated in different periods and patients were not blinded. Differences were significant immediately after surgery, at one hour and at one month, but not at every assessment. These results cannot establish that hydrogen caused the differences. Mouse and blood-cell experiments were exploratory.

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Adults aged 20–75 undergoing endoscopic discectomy for chronic sciatica.

Intervention and dose

Open nasal cannula during the operation only, alongside standard anesthetic/sedation care. · Source: 66.7% H₂ / 33.3% O₂. Inspired H₂ approximately 4% was estimated after air entrainment, not measured.

Duration

During the operation only; exact session duration not verified. Pain assessed in PACU, at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours, and at one month.

Reported result

Pain, PACU: hydrogen: 2.04 ± 1.76; comparator: 5.25 ± 2.86; between group: Difference −3.21; 95% CI −5.02 to −1.41; Holm-adjusted p = 0.002. Pain, 1 hour: between group: Difference −2.42; 95% CI −3.85 to −0.98; Holm-adjusted p = 0.004. Pain, 6 / 12 / 24 hours: between group: Holm-adjusted p = 0.071 / 0.081 / 0.350; not significant. Pain, one month: between group: Difference −3.45; 95% CI −4.80 to −2.10; Holm-adjusted p < 0.001. Intraoperative fentanyl: hydrogen: 265.38 ± 99.24 micrograms; comparator: 347.92 ± 93.82 micrograms; between group: Difference −82.54 micrograms; 95% CI −162.61 to −2.47; p = 0.044. Rescue analgesia: hydrogen: 5/13; comparator: 10/12; between group: p = 0.041.

Main limitation

Nonrandomized sequential cohorts, no sham or blinding, and original outcomes missing for 12 of 25 hydrogen-period patients. Small samples and time-period or co-treatment confounding prevent causal conclusions. Inspired and environmental H₂ concentration were not measured. The registered one-week outcome was unavailable; the one-month contrast partly reflects increased pain in controls. Mouse and blood-cell findings do not validate a human mechanism. Pain P values were Holm adjusted; displayed confidence intervals were not multiplicity adjusted.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Pilot open-label, nonrandomized clinical study with sequential treatment periods; separate exploratory mouse and human blood-cell experiments in the same publication.

Research topic

Musculoskeletal and pain research

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Adults aged 20–75 undergoing endoscopic discectomy for chronic sciatica.

Sample

37 enrolled: 25 in the hydrogen period and 12 controls. Only 25 source-verifiable patients were analyzed (13 hydrogen, 12 control); original outcome records for 12 of 25 hydrogen-period participants were unavailable. No imputation.

Duration

During the operation only; exact session duration not verified. Pain assessed in PACU, at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours, and at one month.

Intervention

Open nasal cannula during the operation only, alongside standard anesthetic/sedation care.

Hydrogen form

Hydrogen and oxygen source-gas mixture; source composition is distinct from inspired concentration.

Dose or H₂ specification

Source: 66.7% H₂ / 33.3% O₂. Inspired H₂ approximately 4% was estimated after air entrainment, not measured.

H₂ flow

Reported total source-gas flow 2 L/min. The approximately 1.33 L/min H₂ component follows from the mixture proportion; it is not a measured inhaled dose.

O₂ delivered with H₂

33.3% O₂ in the source mixture; controls received standard oxygen/air without a sham device.

Comparator

Standard oxygen/air without hydrogen; no sham gas device.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Postoperative 0–10 numerical pain-rating score over time.

Reported result

Pain, PACU: hydrogen: 2.04 ± 1.76; comparator: 5.25 ± 2.86; between group: Difference −3.21; 95% CI −5.02 to −1.41; Holm-adjusted p = 0.002. Pain, 1 hour: between group: Difference −2.42; 95% CI −3.85 to −0.98; Holm-adjusted p = 0.004. Pain, 6 / 12 / 24 hours: between group: Holm-adjusted p = 0.071 / 0.081 / 0.350; not significant. Pain, one month: between group: Difference −3.45; 95% CI −4.80 to −2.10; Holm-adjusted p < 0.001. Intraoperative fentanyl: hydrogen: 265.38 ± 99.24 micrograms; comparator: 347.92 ± 93.82 micrograms; between group: Difference −82.54 micrograms; 95% CI −162.61 to −2.47; p = 0.044. Rescue analgesia: hydrogen: 5/13; comparator: 10/12; between group: p = 0.041.

Extraction completeness

The available main full text was reviewed for methods, results, limitations and declarations. Remaining source-specific uncertainties are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

No adverse events documented in the 25 verifiable clinical records; substantial missing source records and small sample prevent a reliable general safety conclusion.

Separate exploratory components

Male C57BL/6 mice with sciatic-nerve chronic-constriction injury, n = 6/group, received H₂/O₂ 1.5 hours/day for 14 days versus air. It was a preventive/protective exposure, not proof of reversal of established pain. Control gas was not oxygen matched. Human PBMC pre/post analysis used 13 hydrogen patients without a parallel control. The mouse and blood-cell findings do not establish a mechanism or clinical benefit in humans.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Nonrandomized sequential cohorts, no sham or blinding, and original outcomes missing for 12 of 25 hydrogen-period patients. Small samples and time-period or co-treatment confounding prevent causal conclusions. Inspired and environmental H₂ concentration were not measured. The registered one-week outcome was unavailable; the one-month contrast partly reflects increased pain in controls. Mouse and blood-cell findings do not validate a human mechanism. Pain P values were Holm adjusted; displayed confidence intervals were not multiplicity adjusted.

Applies directly to

Adults aged 20–75 undergoing endoscopic discectomy for chronic sciatica. Findings apply only to the studied design and exposure; no treatment or device recommendation.

Funding and support

Cathay General Hospital 111-CGH-FJU-03 and Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital PL-202108018-V.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest declared.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 42796391 · DOI: 10.3390/medicina62091785

Publisher access

Complete article in PubMed Central, including tables.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. The source version and access limitations are stated in this record. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

Methods 2.1–2.9 Results 3.1–3.3; Tables 1–2 Discussion 4 and Conclusions 5 Ethics, registration, funding and conflict declarations

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete article in PubMed Central, including tables.

Registry / related-source limitations

ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT05476575 was first submitted on 27 October 2021; recruitment began on 28 October 2021. The record was first publicly posted on 27 July 2022, after the final recruitment period. The article describes registration as prospective because submission preceded recruitment. The registry describes a nonrandomized, unmasked study with actual enrollment of 37.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.