Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

The effects of 6-month hydrogen-rich water intake on molecular and phenotypic biomarkers of aging in older adults aged 70 years and over: A randomized controlled pilot trial

Zanini D, Todorovic N, Korovljev D, Stajer V, Ostojic J, Purac J, Kojic D, Vukasinovic E, Djordjievski S, Sopic M, Guzonjic A, Ninic A, Erceg S, Ostojic SM. · Exp Gerontol. 2021;155:111574.

HumanH₂-rich waterPublished 2021Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

A six-month pilot in older adults found a borderline difference in a telomere measurement and selected secondary results. Most metabolic, sleep and cognitive measures were unchanged. These findings do not demonstrate slower aging or longer life.

Source data warningGrowth-hormone prose suggests an increase, but Table 1 reports hydrogen 1.11 to 0.94 IU/L, P = 0.29. The comparison is nonsignificant; an increase is not established.
Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Apparently healthy adults aged at least 70, with normal/overweight BMI and no acute or major chronic disorder; age 76.0 ± 5.6 years; twenty women.

Intervention and dose

0.5 L/day at 15 ppm H₂ for six months: one Rejuvenation tablet in 250 mL tap water twice daily on an empty stomach. HRW Natural Health Products / DrinkHRW supplied the magnesium-reaction tablets; H₂ checked by gas chromatography. · 15 ppm dissolved H₂, 0.5 L/day; not gas inhalation.

Duration

Six months; no post-treatment follow-up.

Reported result

Primary group-by-time P = 0.049: telomere ratio 0.99 ± 0.15 to 1.02 ± 0.26 with hydrogen versus 0.92 ± 0.27 to 0.79 ± 0.15 control. TET2 P = 0.040: 0.81 ± 0.52 to 1.62 ± 0.66 versus 1.13 ± 0.82 to 1.76 ± 0.87. Chair stands 10.6 ± 2.4 to 11.6 ± 2.6 versus 12.8 ± 2.1 to 12.5 ± 1.8 (P = 0.01); SF-36 pain 75 ± 23 to 79 ± 25 versus 78 ± 23 to 65 ± 27 (P = 0.05). Selected brain-metabolite regions favored hydrogen and one creatine region favored control, without demonstrated cognitive benefit. Global DNA methylation P = 0.166, MDA P = 0.17, FRAP P = 0.10 and magnesium P = 0.09 were nonsignificant. Most metabolic, lipid, glucose/insulin, hormone, oxidation/inflammation, blood-pressure, body-composition and physical comparisons were null. Sleep total P = 0.69, getting asleep P = 0.11, daytime dysfunction P = 0.15; MMSE P = 0.81, ADAS-Cog total P = 0.97; facial features P = 0.98. Adherence by tablet counts: 96.2% versus 97.8%.

Main limitation

Small complete-case pilot, many secondary outcomes and brain regions, no clearly reported multiplicity adjustment, borderline primary P value, uncertain arm denominators and concealment/blinding. Surrogate signals do not establish longevity, anti-aging or cognitive benefit.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized placebo-controlled parallel pilot at the University of Novi Sad. Missing data were excluded. Blinding and allocation concealment procedures were not sufficiently described to confirm double blinding.

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration form

H₂-rich water

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Apparently healthy adults aged at least 70, with normal/overweight BMI and no acute or major chronic disorder; age 76.0 ± 5.6 years; twenty women.

Sample

40 enrolled; 34 completed; six withdrawals, four hydrogen and two control, described as unrelated to the study without detailed individual reasons. Exact randomized and analyzed arm denominators were not explicitly stated; allocation is not inferred from the total.

Duration

Six months; no post-treatment follow-up.

Intervention

0.5 L/day at 15 ppm H₂ for six months: one Rejuvenation tablet in 250 mL tap water twice daily on an empty stomach. HRW Natural Health Products / DrinkHRW supplied the magnesium-reaction tablets; H₂ checked by gas chromatography.

Hydrogen form

Hydrogen-rich water

Dose or H₂ specification

15 ppm dissolved H₂, 0.5 L/day; not gas inhalation.

Comparator

Similar appearance, texture and sensory properties, 0 ppm H₂, matched total magnesium. Usual diet/activity maintained; other supplements avoided.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Primary: relative telomere length by qPCR. Numerous secondary molecular, metabolic, brain-spectroscopy, physical, sleep, cognitive and quality-of-life measures.

Reported result

Primary group-by-time P = 0.049: telomere ratio 0.99 ± 0.15 to 1.02 ± 0.26 with hydrogen versus 0.92 ± 0.27 to 0.79 ± 0.15 control. TET2 P = 0.040: 0.81 ± 0.52 to 1.62 ± 0.66 versus 1.13 ± 0.82 to 1.76 ± 0.87. Chair stands 10.6 ± 2.4 to 11.6 ± 2.6 versus 12.8 ± 2.1 to 12.5 ± 1.8 (P = 0.01); SF-36 pain 75 ± 23 to 79 ± 25 versus 78 ± 23 to 65 ± 27 (P = 0.05). Selected brain-metabolite regions favored hydrogen and one creatine region favored control, without demonstrated cognitive benefit. Global DNA methylation P = 0.166, MDA P = 0.17, FRAP P = 0.10 and magnesium P = 0.09 were nonsignificant. Most metabolic, lipid, glucose/insulin, hormone, oxidation/inflammation, blood-pressure, body-composition and physical comparisons were null. Sleep total P = 0.69, getting asleep P = 0.11, daytime dysfunction P = 0.15; MMSE P = 0.81, ADAS-Cog total P = 0.97; facial features P = 0.98. Adherence by tablet counts: 96.2% versus 97.8%.

Extraction completeness

Main-text methods, results, limitations and declarations were reviewed. Source versions, missing information and conflicting findings are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

No major side effects precluding participation reported, using an open-ended questionnaire. Detailed event counts were incomplete; general long-term safety is not established.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small complete-case pilot, many secondary outcomes and brain regions, no clearly reported multiplicity adjustment, borderline primary P value, uncertain arm denominators and concealment/blinding. Surrogate signals do not establish longevity, anti-aging or cognitive benefit.

Applies directly to

Limited to the population/model and protocol described above. These findings do not provide a treatment, concentration or device recommendation.

Funding and support

Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development 175037; Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research 142-451-3097; Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad; HRW Natural Health Products Inc.

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflicts. Commercial company funding/support is separately disclosed.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 34601077 · DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111574

Publisher access

Complete final Experimental Gerontology article, eight journal pages plus a ResearchGate cover identifying coauthor Jelena Purac’s upload on 11 October 2021; hosted by Molecular Hydrogen Institute.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

All main Methods 2.1–2.4, Results, Tables 1–4, Figures 1–2/captions, Discussion/limitations, ethics, consent, data availability, contributions, competing interests, acknowledgments and funding.

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete final Experimental Gerontology article, eight journal pages plus a ResearchGate cover identifying coauthor Jelena Purac’s upload on 11 October 2021; hosted by Molecular Hydrogen Institute.

Registry / related-source limitations

NCT04430803; ethics University of Novi Sad 46-06-01/2020-1.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.