Languages

Read Hydrogenology in your language

Automatic translation noticeHydrogenology was originally written in English. The name Hydrogenology is a proper name and is never translated. Other language versions are translated automatically with AI and may contain inaccuracies, especially in scientific or medical terminology. When precision matters, consult the English version and the linked original source.

Selecting a language opens an automatic Google translation of the current page. You can also use your browser's built-in translation option; in Chrome, use the Translate icon in the address bar or right-click the page and choose Translate. Google Chrome translation help ↗

Europe

Widely spoken languages

Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Study on Skin Improvement Effect of Hydrogen Water Cleansing on Skin

최인정;강상모 / In-Jeong Cho;Sang-Mo Kang · Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology. 2019;25(5):1040–1053.

HumanOther formsPublished 2019Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

A small Korean study compared facewashing with electrolyzed hydrogen-containing water and tap water in 24 people over four weeks. Some imaging measures improved within the hydrogen group; porphyrin and keratin results were null. Unclear allocation, water-chemistry differences and statistical pooling prevent firm conclusions about hydrogen.

Source data warningPooled tables count four correlated sites as n = 48 per arm despite twelve people, without clear within-person correlation handling. Pigmentation control baseline is 25.65 in the table but 26.65 in prose. Headline pore percentages conflict (25.25%, 27.97%, 27.92%); no headline percentage benefit is endorsed.
Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Healthy Seoul adults in their twenties to forties; men and women; 24 January–22 February 2019.

Intervention and dose

Tap water electrolyzed for ten minutes with an unnamed Korean H-company generator, used immediately for facewashing over four weeks. Ten minutes is preparation time; per-wash exposure duration, volume and frequency were not clearly specified. · Measured dissolved H₂ 500–700 ppb (approximately 0.5–0.7 mg/L), ENH-1000; pH 7.2–7.6, ORP −100 to +100 mV. This is topical facewashing, not drinking water.

Duration

Four weeks; measurements before/after, thirty minutes and two hours after washing; keratin at two hours.

Reported result

Within-arm pooled table results: pore index hydrogen 32.44 ± 4.03 to 24.25 ± 3.44 (P = 0.002), tap water 22.06 ± 3.07 to 22.65 ± 3.19 (P = 0.613). Pigmentation hydrogen 27.23 ± 2.38 to 22.67 ± 1.88 (P = 0.002), control 25.65 ± 2.35 to 25.81 ± 2.00 (P = 0.887). Wrinkle index hydrogen 10.90 ± 1.76 to 6.65 ± 1.43 (P < 0.001), control 8.13 ± 1.44 to 7.96 ± 1.48 (P = 0.834). Porphyrin did not significantly change in either group. Keratin hydrogen 24.38 ± 1.71 to 21.92 ± 1.71 (P = 0.118), control 24.27 ± 1.25 to 24.94 ± 1.26 (P = 0.624). These are within-arm paired tests, not verified between-arm change effects.

Main limitation

Small healthy sample, short winter period, unclear/randomization not stated, baseline differences, usual cosmetics, unmatched water chemistry, many paired site/outcome tests without clear multiplicity adjustment or confidence intervals, and possible pseudoreplication. Significance in one arm but not the other does not establish a between-arm benefit. Cosmetic imaging is not demonstrated treatment of disease or anti-aging efficacy.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Four-week controlled before/after two-arm experiment. Random allocation, concealment and blinding were not stated.

Original-language title

수소수 세안이 피부에 미치는 피부 개선 효과 연구

Publication dates

31 October 2019.

Research topic

Skin, wound and aging research

Administration form

Other forms

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Healthy Seoul adults in their twenties to forties; men and women; 24 January–22 February 2019.

Sample

24 people, twelve per arm. Tables retain twelve per group at individual sites. Four facial sites create pooled n = 48 observations per arm, not 48 people per arm; no attrition flow or sex breakdown reported.

Duration

Four weeks; measurements before/after, thirty minutes and two hours after washing; keratin at two hours.

Intervention

Tap water electrolyzed for ten minutes with an unnamed Korean H-company generator, used immediately for facewashing over four weeks. Ten minutes is preparation time; per-wash exposure duration, volume and frequency were not clearly specified.

Hydrogen form

Hydrogen-containing topical water

Dose or H₂ specification

Measured dissolved H₂ 500–700 ppb (approximately 0.5–0.7 mg/L), ENH-1000; pH 7.2–7.6, ORP −100 to +100 mV. This is topical facewashing, not drinking water.

Comparator

Untreated tap-water facewashing; usual skincare continued. Comparator H₂, pH, ORP and other chemistry were not matched/reported.

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Willcam imaging of porphyrin, pore area, pigmentation and wrinkles at forehead, cheeks and chin; tape keratin; three readings per site. Room 20–25°C, relative humidity 40–60%.

Reported result

Within-arm pooled table results: pore index hydrogen 32.44 ± 4.03 to 24.25 ± 3.44 (P = 0.002), tap water 22.06 ± 3.07 to 22.65 ± 3.19 (P = 0.613). Pigmentation hydrogen 27.23 ± 2.38 to 22.67 ± 1.88 (P = 0.002), control 25.65 ± 2.35 to 25.81 ± 2.00 (P = 0.887). Wrinkle index hydrogen 10.90 ± 1.76 to 6.65 ± 1.43 (P < 0.001), control 8.13 ± 1.44 to 7.96 ± 1.48 (P = 0.834). Porphyrin did not significantly change in either group. Keratin hydrogen 24.38 ± 1.71 to 21.92 ± 1.71 (P = 0.118), control 24.27 ± 1.25 to 24.94 ± 1.26 (P = 0.624). These are within-arm paired tests, not verified between-arm change effects.

Extraction completeness

Main-text methods, results, limitations and declarations were reviewed. Source versions, missing information and conflicting findings are stated in this record.

Reported adverse events

No dedicated adverse-event monitoring/counts reported; introductory safety assertions are not trial harms data.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small healthy sample, short winter period, unclear/randomization not stated, baseline differences, usual cosmetics, unmatched water chemistry, many paired site/outcome tests without clear multiplicity adjustment or confidence intervals, and possible pseudoreplication. Significance in one arm but not the other does not establish a between-arm benefit. Cosmetic imaging is not demonstrated treatment of disease or anti-aging efficacy.

Applies directly to

Limited to the population/model and protocol described above. These findings do not provide a treatment, concentration or device recommendation.

Funding and support

No explicit funding statement found in the complete article; generator brand anonymized as a domestic H company.

Conflicts of interest

No explicit competing-interest declaration found. Both authors affiliated with Konkuk biological engineering.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

KCI: ART002519543

Publisher access

Complete original fourteen-page Korean-language journal PDF, pages 1040–1053, with English abstract, in the official e-jkc.org archive.

Editorial verification

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. No independent clinical or statistical assessment has been performed.

Source sections checked

Pages 1040–1053: bibliography/abstract; Methods II.1–4; Tables 1–12 for porphyrin, pores, pigmentation, wrinkles and keratin; Conclusion and references.

Extraction basis

AI-assisted editorial review of the available main full text, 29 October 2026. Complete original fourteen-page Korean-language journal PDF, pages 1040–1053, with English abstract, in the official e-jkc.org archive.

Registry / related-source limitations

Konkuk University ethics 7001355-201812-HR-289; written consent reported. No trial registration identified.

Last reviewed

29 October 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 692 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.