Hydrogenology
Hydrogenology editorial study record

Molecular hydrogen exposure improves functional state of red blood cells in the early postoperative period: a randomized clinical study

Deryugina AV et al. · Med Gas Res. 2023;13(2):59–66.

HumanOther formsPublished 2023
Study record, not medical adviceThis page reports one source and Hydrogenology’s source-text extraction. It does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person. Human, animal and laboratory evidence must not be treated as equivalent.
Source and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence stream

Human

Reported design

Randomized perioperative clinical study

Research topic

Cardiovascular and circulatory health

Administration classification

Other forms

Study result signal

Not reported in this record.

Outcome type

Not reported in this record.

Reported in the source

Methods at a glance

Population or model

Adults undergoing elective valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Sample

The article is internally inconsistent: it states 20 enrolled but describes 24 randomized, 12 per group

Duration

From tracheal intubation throughout the operation; postoperative measures through day 3

Intervention

H₂ added to the ventilator breathing circuit immediately after intubation and throughout surgery

Hydrogen form

H₂ added to an anesthesia air–oxygen mixture — not Brown’s gas.

H₂ specification

1.5–2.0% H₂ in the breathing circuit; anesthesia used an air–oxygen mixture reported as 50% O₂.

H₂ flow

Not reported — total ventilator circuit flow is absent, so absolute H₂ flow cannot be calculated.

O₂ delivered with H₂

50% O₂ is reported for the anesthesia mixture; absolute O₂ flow is not reported.

Comparator

Standard anesthesia without added H₂

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Red-blood-cell aggregation, metabolism and oxidative-stress measures; cardiac contractile-function indicators

Reported result

Several red-cell laboratory measures and cardiac-function indicators favored the H₂ group. The study was not designed around mortality or major clinical events.

Results-extraction completeness

Concentration, methods, results, funding and conflicts checked in the open-access full text; sample-size inconsistency and absent flow remain unresolved.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit. Null findings, outcome type, study design and precision all matter.

Interpretation limits

Cautions and applicability

Design and reporting cautions

Small perioperative study with an unresolved 20-versus-24 sample inconsistency, unreported gas flow and mainly laboratory outcomes. One author was an employee of the generator manufacturer; public academic-program support was reported.

Applies directly to

Adults undergoing elective valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass under the reported anesthesia protocol.

Preliminary appraisal framework

Not reported in this record.

Preliminary risk-of-bias status

Not reported in this record.

Appraisal rationale

Not reported in this record.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Certainty is assessed by important outcome across a complete eligible evidence set, not by attaching a final grade to one source.

Provenance

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 36204784 · DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.356473

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text and PubMed bibliographic record.

Record revision

2026-08-10