Hydrogenology
Source-linked study record

Molecular hydrogen inhalation modulates resting metabolism in healthy females: findings from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study

Grepl P et al. · Med Gas Res. 2025;15(3):367–373.

HumanInhaled H₂Published 2025Source checked
Study record, not medical adviceThis record reports what the source states. It is not medical advice and does not establish that molecular hydrogen is effective, safe or appropriate for any person.
Quick summary

Study at a glance

Evidence type

Human

Population or model

Physically active healthy young women

Intervention and dose

Gas through a nasal cannula at 300 mL/min for 60 minutes while seated at rest · 99.8% H₂, 0.12% N₂, 0.055% O₂ and less than 0.002% CO₂.

Duration

Single 60-minute session per condition with a 7-day crossover washout

Reported result

H₂ inhalation lowered respiratory exchange ratio and ventilation across intervals, interpreted as greater resting fat oxidation. This was an acute resting physiological study, not a clinical outcome trial.

Main limitation

Small acute study in healthy young women, using surrogate metabolic outcomes. One author was an external research consultant to H2 Global Group; Palacký University support was reported.

Evidence and classification

What kind of evidence is this?

Evidence type

Human

Reported design

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study

Research topic

Metabolic and lipid health

Administration form

Inhaled H₂

Information not yet classified

Some editorial classification fields are still pending. The source-reported outcomes and result are shown below; Hydrogenology does not infer a positive or negative signal from prose automatically.

Reported in the source

Methods

Population or model

Physically active healthy young women

Sample

20 participants; mean age 22.1 years

Duration

Single 60-minute session per condition with a 7-day crossover washout

Intervention

Gas through a nasal cannula at 300 mL/min for 60 minutes while seated at rest

Hydrogen form

H₂ alone at high source-gas purity — not Brown’s gas.

Dose or H₂ specification

99.8% H₂, 0.12% N₂, 0.055% O₂ and less than 0.002% CO₂.

H₂ flow

299.4 mL/min H₂, calculated as 300 mL/min total source-gas flow × 99.8% H₂.

O₂ delivered with H₂

0.165 mL/min O₂, calculated as 300 mL/min × 0.055% O₂; this is a trace constituent, not supplemental oxygen.

Comparator

Ambient air through a modified generator at 300 mL/min

Reported, not endorsed

Outcomes and reported result

Outcomes measured

Respiratory exchange ratio, ventilation, indirect-calorimetry measures and estimated substrate use

Reported result

H₂ inhalation lowered respiratory exchange ratio and ventilation across intervals, interpreted as greater resting fat oxidation. This was an acute resting physiological study, not a clinical outcome trial.

Extraction completeness

Gas composition, flow, methods, results, funding and conflict statement checked in the open-access full text; independent appraisal remains incomplete.

A reported association, difference or mechanism is not automatically a clinical benefit.

Interpretation limits

Limitations and applicability

Main methodological cautions

Small acute study in healthy young women, using surrogate metabolic outcomes. One author was an external research consultant to H2 Global Group; Palacký University support was reported.

Applies directly to

Healthy physically active young women resting under the reported laboratory protocol.

No single-study GRADE certainty rating is assigned. Read how records and evidence assessments are prepared.

Sources and status

Sources and record status

Identifiers

PMID: 39923133 · DOI: 10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-24-00085

Publisher access

Open-access full text is available through PMC.

Extraction basis

Open-access PMC full text and PubMed bibliographic record.

Last reviewed

10 August 2026

Help the next reader

Help people check the facts before they buy.

Hydrogenology keeps 665 source-checked records accessible without advertising or product promotion.

Support independent access
Help us correct the recordReport a discrepancy

Send the exact difference between this page and the linked source. The study reference is attached automatically.